IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [99attendees] Prague Public Transportation Tickets

Ondřej Caletka <Ondrej.Caletka@cesnet.cz> Wed, 19 July 2017 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Ondrej.Caletka@cesnet.cz>
X-Original-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3616131A4C for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cesnet.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2T3949DZ6-hb for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office2.cesnet.cz (office2.cesnet.cz [IPv6:2001:718:1:101::144:244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFC67131667 for <99attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oskarpc.cesnet.cz (oskarpc.cesnet.cz [IPv6:2001:718:1:6::134:196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by office2.cesnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E543B20005; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:55:11 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cesnet.cz; s=office2; t=1500454511; bh=j3AFKuWXN60UYSY65DnCtGMzCQyfmC6hJ2D59siNTdA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Jo3ucLOUi3bxyBJx0GW0NTyW2PbCjMVu86su9jxv+kUWsPM7jGMxeUwy+gtsqjEE+ TLO5gcUbDxvqTRGLmbYeeliBjbWevKqjFSc9gGxqhGUCiFKhFHvtEWqwUBlDdBVliw ZKc/spjckvu5caByd+K0C3k6JFGoQhxtEfP7xR7I=
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:55:10 +0200
From: Ondřej Caletka <Ondrej.Caletka@cesnet.cz>
To: "Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS" <david.somers-harris@rakuten.com>
Cc: John Dowdell <john.dowdell.ietf@gmail.com>, "99attendees@ietf.org" <99attendees@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170719085510.GG12548@oskarpc.cesnet.cz>
References: <3b4372bf-72af-386c-99bd-a9146d372a70@tcinet.ru> <DCAA4FE1-6BDC-4846-ADA7-F3E5D0C9187B@nic.cz> <8e80defd-dc1c-1bb9-40d7-f7129a41d447@oracle.com> <B42AF3F2-A93A-4E23-A303-170A9A0ED0CB@gmail.com> <daeba668-522b-c3a0-586c-3da5d6bf04bb@cesnet.cz> <B255867E-444D-484D-9E88-323A8F004489@rakuten.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha256"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="Lb0e7rgc7IsuDeGj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B255867E-444D-484D-9E88-323A8F004489@rakuten.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/99attendees/JhVsZh6-Og33kZ92E0Z3syerSTA>
Subject: Re: [99attendees] Prague Public Transportation Tickets
X-BeenThere: 99attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 99 attendees that have opted in on this list <99attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/99attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:99attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:55:16 -0000

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:47:32PM +0000, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote:
> When I received the ticket, the kind young man handing them out explained to me that it was necessary for me to validate them.
> That may explain why a lot of other people are confused.
> 
> Perhaps next time such details could be clarified with whoever is manning the registration tables in order to avoid such confusion.

That's probably a misunderstanding. On the other hand, with trying to
validate ticket that is not validable, you are of the safe side.

--
Ondřej

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email