IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-03.txt

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 19 September 2022 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA54C1524C3 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TlW_jda2MICT for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D296C14F607 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id e81so23372101ybb.13 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=I3RabsSUa4KD9I6a0YGHHm/rKTyGExLT1FVP6mKgSEM=; b=GKac5jSQrhcfwbfZXT5zeqhsvUh+KZv9OPd9csM8w+PQTEAKD8u1D6pYydYrysngjI ppJnbXZ43ivzdlmWUj8XWCvmbvGgRUnlINVVKdz7VlX+lxeM3RAD3LezN+9ehuMJqi/k fFMSEs5h4CAMOeo83aCNyc37zZXouQpcAexjRVjS5uIJcjxGQcJc9pXLBMdrAlAHiG94 vq/6uszX8Iu6vaRHNjvuEZXWdBnHMCofEvZi415RVEAe5CDsjXCrLHWXi5YQZB9Uxff6 TcnZXnRq956lUQxWt/s+PyuDd+eP/rzgG9ftqOu3eHJ6dgVYP5l5a+rtsyUeMMcEkzzE Xe5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=I3RabsSUa4KD9I6a0YGHHm/rKTyGExLT1FVP6mKgSEM=; b=RIHkbSlyqMDLHrT8CkTjD205hI905fS0JIWmqbWafpfoCvkJXvJMh5F0rA4NLEMsoT q6NL+trG8csA/6DttVYLbi7ShhBZTPiErvKVTUskjittHfECPrkodi6bWFnt7RRGse3M JzC5hpl9q453pS9n39Bh/43YFLFrTRX2fsCk7w3uEA64G1FW7jT4kg0bISG9y5E8o3ww rIlwfcmnt3D5Gl+V3A+F4G1hJfGd8ZIWWEcUJSUgf/8K2bQx8JZRouXq6BO26fkAil0r tj7GA8GcNmmUz3r+XCZoHiymMhOtefHs27JPzJ361BSah9tdiK7pKgJa9QLf2Epw5Z92 E3Sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2g/J7CmAHc1HwRjjyQlkatyFO+QoMfxmR3s1krHSwQGMo5iSx2 1cVY5qu28zDnJIMxtjGpvw95a5ZqfYWUmpMaGIhro9fg
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6sPpB9NwLuFGmqGwofbIxHjzaLP3lr2oRwtJCAE1hPZU/03dSwNI+a5tfxJDkpvhmYXCRAeFeqr9Tbr24KJ1M=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:846:0:b0:6a8:c5de:3e37 with SMTP id 67-20020a250846000000b006a8c5de3e37mr14793386ybi.412.1663597968387; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166211097297.15936.4492846068479619668@ietfa.amsl.com> <871qsui0ig.fsf@wangari> <CADZyTkkqcgSnWhEmwYJ9a+R4o2gQRQ19VFGLX1DdhDYqiikxjQ@mail.gmail.com> <87zgevmo9d.fsf@wangari>
In-Reply-To: <87zgevmo9d.fsf@wangari>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:32:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkkq8=sf=g8GEC2GOf-MSN0nhkoUrDK2f0M--i7mA96D8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org>
Cc: Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f4786905e90895c6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/kTGXKKiUDT7T4FzrnHjE5RDlmDo>
Subject: Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:32:50 -0000

You are correct, it might be clearer to keep it.

Yours,
Daniel

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:29 AM Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for pushing this document forward.
>
> On 2022-09-16, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There two nits to address before the draft can be moved forward .
> >
> >   ** The abstract seems to contain references ([RFC9202]), which it
> >      shouldn't.  Please replace those with straight textual mentions of
> the
> >      documents in question.
>
> Okay, I will fix this.
>
> >  ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 6347 (Obsoleted by RFC 9147)
>
> The full text reads:
>
>    [RFC9202] only specifies the use of DTLS [RFC6347] [RFC9147] but
>    works equally well for TLS [RFC8446].
>
> The reference to DTLS version 1.2 is explicitly included because RFC
> 9202 specifies the use of DTLS version 1.2 (and mentions that DTLS
> version 1.3 can be used instead).
>
> I am happy to delete the reference to DTLS 1.2 but I am wondering if
> this could lead to confusion?
>
> Grüße
> Olaf
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email