Re: [Acme] kinds of proof

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 28 November 2014 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7820F1A00B1 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:31:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dVJQbqPGw6tR for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:31:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 700E31A00AD for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:31:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (142-254-17-143.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sASIVacR042518 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:31:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 142-254-17-143.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.143] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwgm2N1Cg=i-HoZyLR1PuG2+5a+Siydo=SXvuGjOojph5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:31:36 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <77B622CF-4FED-4CEC-9383-53C178D2B71C@vpnc.org>
References: <AD5940AA-6F01-4D0E-A4E0-19AEA56BBED3@vpnc.org> <CAL02cgTgpjQffow2XuaNuT7BtqYVttXdVUgyqBFbsAbN4g0VzQ@mail.gmail.com> <DEC7A8A8-563D-41B3-94AC-71DC7219D3F8@cisco.com> <m27fyg4yzg.wl%randy@psg.com> <547754C0.9050306@cs.tcd.ie> <20141127211348.GE25114@mournblade.imrryr.org> <54784C61.2080508@cs.tcd.ie> <1F442BA7-C7D4-49AD-AA9D-49B86B39159D@vpnc.org> <CAMm+Lwgm2N1Cg=i-HoZyLR1PuG2+5a+Siydo=SXvuGjOojph5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/RuzjtvGBYrl2vcs845EBk2HLUV4
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] kinds of proof
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:31:40 -0000

On Nov 28, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
> I think the underlying question is whether we are just going to
> support one provider of free certs (who has yet to issue one) or
> support a more general approach.

That doesn't seem like an underlying question at all. The current ACME pre-draft supports the general case, and so far no one other than you have suggested otherwise.

--Paul Hoffman