[Acme] ACME or EST?

Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Fri, 28 November 2014 00:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5417C1A0367 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:34:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qprjKnjm85vb for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D8B1A0252 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so4371961obc.15 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:34:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GRNmIXEXzvuCLMzo0jIbXUYq4XE8cwfruQ4sl568HAY=; b=ekQSUK2HCorUeWvUYlvfl6UzxKy/C11HuBNF1q31gDQfstAUokiwuxZ68vhF17kgqb x3A2LynNjHFTvpGgJ8XIkckEeSIVw1+0qQkZ/PQtvQOrwSAFd0eTP/iY4vXf5Sr9oMW7 Ctb9xz2ATYVDt5N9kwSb2unYfMfuiknd2hJU3tmIRcBZbsf6q9u1DKWucieTpYUcEWQ1 3bjYvss+K/0yzDmkCznn8lEc6tz0eH7/u2F54PbNQ3v0PTz4YfpGZ6la88HVDLELTGyJ NlW7o7uHPdH8vxRJwSYQsCDG/HG+MW93iKR4ILXCfv/soG5gXre46B9owISplh30XC7Y 5L1A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.55.200 with SMTP id u8mr25106960oep.43.1417134855069; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.81.233 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:34:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0301MB0655D5E0292BAE408C92B3B7A8710@DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AD5940AA-6F01-4D0E-A4E0-19AEA56BBED3@vpnc.org> <CAL02cgTgpjQffow2XuaNuT7BtqYVttXdVUgyqBFbsAbN4g0VzQ@mail.gmail.com> <DEC7A8A8-563D-41B3-94AC-71DC7219D3F8@cisco.com> <CAHOTMVLJFQsKUVaZueeqx4NRtzM+a4asU14YnQPC+2LHQCtcEQ@mail.gmail.com> <54752FD9.6040708@cs.tcd.ie> <m27fyg4yzg.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAMm+LwjOgYistjb8jo_aw0jJ9+0YpL++Y4yJONj1rCGG0kC94A@mail.gmail.com> <DM2PR0301MB0655D5E0292BAE408C92B3B7A8710@DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:34:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHOTMV+Ch3ViOfQbiwfh=UU96pGONBZiMsaDZUn1x5cHOT=wNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011606eea2a6b60508e06bb9
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/VwowtU5dsxZV-4vw32m8BB12Aj8
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: [Acme] ACME or EST?
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:34:17 -0000

On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','huitema@microsoft.com');>> wrote:
>
> I am not sure that the message description language matters very much
>

Here's a paper that argues otherwise:

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~sergey/langsec/papers/langsec-tr.pdf


-- 
Tony Arcieri