IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] ACME or EST?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 27 November 2014 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B341A0086 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:43:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kgrRQkssvczS for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B351A0092 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1221EBED1; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:43:46 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S4nx7X9XRsks; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:43:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.7] (unknown [86.42.22.226]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7D51BECC; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:43:44 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <547754C0.9050306@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:43:44 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
References: <AD5940AA-6F01-4D0E-A4E0-19AEA56BBED3@vpnc.org> <CAL02cgTgpjQffow2XuaNuT7BtqYVttXdVUgyqBFbsAbN4g0VzQ@mail.gmail.com> <DEC7A8A8-563D-41B3-94AC-71DC7219D3F8@cisco.com> <m27fyg4yzg.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m27fyg4yzg.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/wgGAr2CFV_FiEFLhZgeMCVzSH2M
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] ACME or EST?
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:43:47 -0000


On 27/11/14 12:19, Randy Bush wrote:
> i would think you, of the farrelous brothers, would be concerned about
> the langsec-friendly aspect.

Not much tbh, far less than getting something that can be
turned on by default. And ISTM that any of the reaosnable
choices, about which we sometimes endlessly debate, all
work.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email