Re: [admin-discuss] Suggestion for COVID management at future meetings

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 09 September 2022 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2ABC14CF0F for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 01:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.342
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.342 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vi4x0_5w2BmL for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 01:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CADF9C14F6E5 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 01:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 2898Ejnh052280 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 10:14:45 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B3240201ADA for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 10:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA64201798 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 10:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.32.70] (is156570.intra.cea.fr [10.8.32.70]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 2898EjQa043385 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 10:14:45 +0200
Message-ID: <25a988c2-e704-c39e-8770-0cde797efe2e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 10:14:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.1
Content-Language: fr
To: admin-discuss@ietf.org
References: <41FAD617-0A61-4762-8661-2C5D4936F93F@ietf.org> <eabb8fbf-21d5-35f2-f2c5-2bc80a897b6c@lounge.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <eabb8fbf-21d5-35f2-f2c5-2bc80a897b6c@lounge.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/VgJHNGlJ6hh_Xm7P8LcLIWwPXh8>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Suggestion for COVID management at future meetings
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 08:14:51 -0000

BIPOC nqtch?  A WG, a BoF or an RG?

Alex

Le 09/09/2022 à 08:07, Dan Harkins a écrit :
> 
>    Well the other thing to keep in mind about masking is that "it 
> remains an
> act of solidarity & respect" for... BIPOC (natch). In other words it's a
> massive virtue signal and we cannot, and should not, discount members 
> desires
> to publicly proclaim they remain in solidarity with, and publicly express
> respect for, BIPOC. Basically, if you don't put on a mask you're just a bad
> person who does not respect BIPOC. So put on your mask. It probably won't
> impact viral load but it will signal your virtue.
> 
>      https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1567843150374256640
> 
>    Dan.
> 
> On 8/30/22 7:13 AM, Jay Daley wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I’ve had an offlist suggestion for a different COVID management policy 
>> for future IETF meetings (i.e. 116 and possibly after that), which is 
>> that we ask all onsite participants to take a rapid antigen test each 
>> morning and confirm that is clear before participating and then masks 
>> are optional and there is no vaccination requirement.  It would be 
>> useful to hear what people think of that.
>>
>> cheers
>> Jay
>>
>