IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [admin-discuss] Suggestion for COVID management at future meetings

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 30 August 2022 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45A6C159A24 for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.342
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.342 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHstYK2437r9 for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E6FC157B53 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 27UIrkw7014688 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:53:46 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B215D206884 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:53:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A958520621E for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:53:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.240.2] ([10.11.240.2]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 27UIrk9u047144 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:53:46 +0200
Message-ID: <1b3756ed-1180-eebd-a41c-84eaf419b008@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:53:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0
Content-Language: fr
To: admin-discuss@ietf.org
References: <41FAD617-0A61-4762-8661-2C5D4936F93F@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <41FAD617-0A61-4762-8661-2C5D4936F93F@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/oimvnP8lIJnqkMQL0Hz_ytRKzAg>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Suggestion for COVID management at future meetings
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:53:52 -0000

Le 30/08/2022 à 16:13, Jay Daley a écrit :
> Hi All
>
> I’ve had an offlist suggestion for a different COVID management policy for future IETF meetings (i.e. 116 and possibly after that), which is that we ask all onsite participants to take a rapid antigen test each morning and confirm that is clear before participating and then masks are optional and there is no vaccination requirement.  It would be useful to hear what people think of that.


If the people come from a place where the wave is at a peak, and the 
meeting place is at a peak too, then these measures might not suffice.

On another hand, if people come from places where the respective waves 
are at a low, and the meeting place is on a low too, then these measures 
are reasonable.  They could be even further reduced, such as removing 
the antigen testing.

Alex


>
> cheers
> Jay
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email