Re: [admin-discuss] Suggestion for COVID management at future meetings

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 30 August 2022 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEF1C157908; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8gg8kCIJyx9D; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D1EC1527AB; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id z8so6600861edb.6; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=9GpGQ1girM6zhqBe8hoddo8Ml4NBLahLSY6IbRcPHW8=; b=U5ukQ2zUpUi7xihhUNe/y/HDuHMyYNhxxk0Ama68K7B9U4OPGlaccQXR+k9JKuRXwJ To31AYOvOo+x3CaWUKEonF8O4jijuBURwFYZnReKFgvyy2o3DvUDNdKA3OlRgU+1rD1z ZYGQTaEWjrMBuHRx986FCKXlYlfSwBev1PoQE/vYuo5wAFMEjs1pEmvQ0lHvYy1AD10L evBEp4136rw5utoh4Orok5IGlHHx7zwo39XLhetoww8OaW3a4lkpDxG7Foh7YTyho8Ag qAGauPQ65iK+/+xSky1xerLhXrKQx21ZcZw5gMpC9jAtWZ+g2M0Vu7v8DtxjXk/NuiDZ p0dQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=9GpGQ1girM6zhqBe8hoddo8Ml4NBLahLSY6IbRcPHW8=; b=tTwNJL5ShEdopjGwKcjA9aEWbCt6u7bRaEhb15ZKAt+vUboU9pfwE4RLGhob8dlE1+ 1R5tk/31Dp/KuZex/OI0IuvtQHgEFu3o51oP96WcFGYdJHYotMO4mouC/uGGb4iPqgCE Pj2PT8hObJSLsTHkF6dqEvfC+GlVhN8woPgBORDaOPO3R7qf5l8N4CS4O8LDBjV1oNwa ESKtSXDtNF3ChHcNPeWWJ4x6yiWIX93Yu/rzDDJWBFz6XyUoIgy1/R1on5vR+suk4GL6 sBrNtJgg4sucVgk3bBSTbSf/4xME9M45ZDS4CsiNqifR3I6JgN2PMiQqx3FAzHF/jltk wLeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1AmBmwZTW2YnI1Ugr0H8Q7VJaQabCZe00XZmHG2o72sc6K6v0s N2ioSUFS/T+7xYBODlQHTm4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7Ffhb3j7EVx+fkPFgu6A9ShD1tYsQ5dqw++AgDfx/Lkbi1y2DshmqLCIJHEOtHjotW2xx+Rw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:156:b0:440:b458:93df with SMTP id s22-20020a056402015600b00440b45893dfmr22324502edu.337.1661884805962; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:1700:4383:c05f:3d29:4bdb:3ee6:6c86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m20-20020a17090679d400b00715a02874acsm6213432ejo.35.2022.08.30.11.40.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5E17D7D3-7E70-421D-AC95-19C852BDB5AA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220830174638.A503448B050A@ary.qy>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:40:02 -0700
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, admin-discuss@ietf.org, exec-director@ietf.org
Message-Id: <D9862F59-A0A8-4312-8069-3BAFFE33C3BB@gmail.com>
References: <20220830174638.A503448B050A@ary.qy>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/fvvA3FGX3-yzR0kQzoV6HFkd_uI>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Suggestion for COVID management at future meetings
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:40:08 -0000


> On Aug 30, 2022, at 10:46 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> It appears that Jay Daley  <exec-director@ietf.org> said:
>> Hi All
>> 
>> I’ve had an offlist suggestion for a different COVID management policy for future IETF meetings (i.e. 116 and
>> possibly after that), which is that we ask all onsite participants to take a rapid antigen test each morning and
>> confirm that is clear before participating and then masks are optional and there is no vaccination requirement.
>> It would be useful to hear what people think of that.
> 
> That would be a poor idea. Rapid tests are useful tools but as we all
> know, they are not infallible and it is quite possible to have COVID
> for a while before testing positive.
> 
> Universal masking slows down transmission in both directions, limiting
> the amount of virus that an infected person exhales, and also limiting
> what uninfected people inhale. Masking at 114 seems to have worked
> quite well. As I understand it the number of people who got COVID at
> the meeting, as opposed to getting it on the way to the meeting, was
> very low.
> 
> Wearing masks is not particularly pleasant, and it is a pain for some
> of us to find masks that fit (the free ones at 114 were too small for
> me) but we know how to do it, and it's cheap.

+1

Bob