IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] brski-discovery vs constrained BRSKI (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-15.txt)

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 23 November 2023 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1688BC14F6EC for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:17:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (bad RSA signature)" header.d=sandelman.ca header.b="alhVus7t"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca header.b="YxZ2d4un"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l70GNUIQm-3X for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B226C151076 for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 07:16:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (ipv6.dyas.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:6::1]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAD321F951; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:16:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1700752611; bh=7EG+Kk/derAR6+RcPD6TixSiOYVbQnjLN+VLvIasz/4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=alhVus7tA1VUXA7q+RFNmkgtktaYtVQ9Dbvgaem1EnKJBO3+LEsfBXnNSmoIg4GDD ROWPxVo8C2Z2swy7nzgz4FZJaZ+piMdEydUV4bocBQV6Q9jVxGsVofSxmcj2gItV6H 4/e84WAlSsV/gjD42polSUi/BM61LycXPcAvee/cGqecdeg1A1BdUsjRRMvdgqDAxd 8/LZnVjlqnJNawW97/m4Rf63kfZvHySbUPt18Xrv9BbUdSUbTJ76hVBuH20eppi6f5 TQStUauWVi/WaViwVgOCvjiXjbOh/rlkWgXCwT7yQMtyP1xeuSu87nIlqyG1laD6EJ tqrSBgKveyUpw==
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D7EFDA05FE; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:16:48 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=dyas; t=1700752608; bh=7EG+Kk/derAR6+RcPD6TixSiOYVbQnjLN+VLvIasz/4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=YxZ2d4un5v2670SHRl1wHiFNyFPPwvbBhaoQeXpZv1sfPFOZfKGwq5T8szwOIAB2u HgqQjI6hvCZTmI2CK/Av6qj9JhLrBRHbhu4GMOPtB4/S/zTnVi2NBc8jxASGPtWQ2X FHDep3VRBviptAY/njEj7oMGMgt228A6uE1rL7Gbw2441B5KpmpLi6cdk2D+eHnFjp eEuObFQPoIHwmrhbI2E0FK2QbJzwBEs8yg3X+LNe9eOa6IavPoPDYEKHnVjJdYs8yU PTUb2dIxG2uheRWlWDFueDjKWiOdMQXWh1tp66tk3I+jdcIgy1zyirnxdhV9rgJVYJ m8WbwF9hlcJwQ==
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B37A05F7; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:16:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <ZVzJYPPRunw5gCAu@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <169927900610.48296.8352405496672443803@ietfa.amsl.com> <3528359.1699280649@dyas> <DU0P190MB1978A1B7481FE707DAB7E507FDBBA@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <ZVzJYPPRunw5gCAu@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Comments: In-reply-to Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> message dated "Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:14:40 +0100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <319811.1700752608.1@dyas>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:16:48 +0100
Message-ID: <319812.1700752608@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/lUeoh-d0X3ll6HtmQEjXlYnMV-0>
Subject: Re: [Anima] brski-discovery vs constrained BRSKI (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-15.txt)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:17:02 -0000

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
    > Check the GRASP text in both drafts, i think the text in
    > constrained-join-proxy is more harmfull to move forward than the one in
    > constrained-voucher. So i would definitely like to see it removed, or i
    > would want to raise concerns about it (which i think we don't need to
    > spend time on to get the constrained docs out the door):

okay.

I won't get rfc8366bis to/past WGLC before January-ish, so everything is
going to wait for that anyway.  If we can sort other things out at the same
time, then I'm all for that.  I want to say that the first
constrained-voucher interop work was in Prague IETF... 2019.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email