Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 17 June 2020 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DDD3A0A85; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imk6GqWev5lH; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7468F3A0A78; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5337; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1592412543; x=1593622143; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=Kn4emAN1ijHVc1NN00MvJ5rhSEbw0405gW850qOdFkM=; b=h1lW4aezy4Jqnr8jLeBDrjvCLigi6pgG4ff+lfS+srvWCbvgyIIPgR6C 1R+0eiVIwgQPMFqhNS/lo7xfUjiKbnl+B4dMtogbutMiNZG/rCw/cNEXn QZQ36Dtz/y3bD0YwB80h8/gKkQKHI1lIGoNy9soW3tn+3cjxs633yRWfy 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DjAQDBSOpe/xbLJq1mGwEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAYIKAoEhgkoBIBIshCSJAYdkJYdVjBWIEgQHAQEBCQM?= =?us-ascii?q?BAS8EAQGERAKCGyU4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FZ0IBEAGFHgEBAQECASN?= =?us-ascii?q?WBQsLGCMHAgJXBhODJgGCXCC2P3aBMoVRhRsQgTgBgVKLJoIAgREnDBCCTT6?= =?us-ascii?q?HUTOCLQSaE5o2gmSDAYEmlHoDHZ5urA6DTgIEBgUCFYFqIoFWMxoIGxVlAYI?= =?us-ascii?q?+PhIZDY5VjhI/AzA3AgYBBwEBAwmGL4peAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,523,1583193600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="27224561"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 Jun 2020 16:48:58 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp4079.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp4079.cisco.com [10.61.79.239]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05HGmvMQ030580 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:48:57 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <64D4A29B-AECC-47B7-9042-30BC1C36EF0F@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AD7175D3-2F91-4D9C-952B-9C38A0B7CA75"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:48:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4603.1592410205@localhost>
Cc: draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra@ietf.org, anima-chairs@ietf.org, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, anima@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <157132132983.10248.1050846253932775557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20191018012352.GB43312@kduck.mit.edu> <22000.1572299410@localhost> <20191029031843.GO69013@kduck.mit.edu> <32493.1572639262@localhost> <9B1718CC-EA1F-44E9-B175-B489B5BE7418@cisco.com> <4603.1592410205@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.79.239, ams3-vpn-dhcp4079.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/r21ft_W3ywXI1gZ8v-9bonuppEo>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-28: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:49:05 -0000


> On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Now that it is it represents a new convention.  The question at hand is
>> whether the information found on the LHS could be subject to
>> misinterpretation by non-participants.  I wonder if we could add an EKU
>> as a SHOULD to break the logjam.
> 
> Because EKUs are so much easier to get into CAs than otherName is?
> Seriously, how does that help at all?

I have definitely seen at least some CAs allow EKUs, such as XMPP, for instance, and was thinking of SHOULD rather than MUST.  But I do have to say that XMPP didn’t have a great experience with them, to be fair.

Eliot