IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] New I-D: text/markdown Media Type - draft-seantek-text-markdown-media-type-00

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 09 July 2014 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F06E1A063C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h5gwN8LKcq16 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11DC41A0546 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id n3so2709428wiv.14 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1AamQsX71c1peRw1eHFHpjMgfpJbfjCgyOMde5h5RQY=; b=HKokTuG8F6lYHXwCsEe+Krs0YjRL+2YucjbFem9jOfayh7IkIaQH/fM0iIMHsvJvgV eBAXEveNfY5yzREkHXbuN+KXO24gdMmy4mJGjaxOhzqZBezwWzuih6O2TklJpF/6D7C9 j4vgoSDheC4FQef05otBmycczSMAvrWrPgkyqscD5wCysmbmpyqYIA6CqMkk6VP6V3dp ZbOyGFIZgHbV4/Xrd3o/0IbQkskYzMMeCg64WLIlxn3KJkP6tWXWwF/AlO0VRiCGpBB+ sIiS7++ZHm3/N5b7T3dHNZtzKijyYIJAku2oSsJCcoejTsFwWg42Ac9IqFiSeVbymhEh AAnQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.98.130 with SMTP id ei2mr11357010wib.24.1404910968609; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.19.74 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALcoZiqTJWu8eXhgv0eHzF7HE+XBCyupK1pcg1tK9WfQVBEe9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53BBF0F0.9000006@seantek.com> <53BBFBA2.5090801@berkeley.edu> <53BC71C1.5080103@seantek.com> <40fb5c2d6eae4c5fbd6243db75f85d69@BL2PR02MB307.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <389FC4D0-4A4F-4F2E-9BDE-83DA8C8E5710@mnot.net> <CALcoZiqTJWu8eXhgv0eHzF7HE+XBCyupK1pcg1tK9WfQVBEe9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:02:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaN_51SpXLMSknkT9S3CnAsbwvH96Zb7kLAMRz7Eo6AKg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9cdcc5d39a37804fdc25373"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/-KJeMGuH5z5ULZ9hXr2oIZ7u0tU
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] New I-D: text/markdown Media Type - draft-seantek-text-markdown-media-type-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 13:02:52 -0000

On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:

> On Jul 8, 2014 9:44 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe a bunch of media types need to be registered then, for the
> "bigger" flavours?
>
> Exactly.
>

Sounds like there's non-trivial interest in this work.  Is this possibly a
new APPSAWG work item, or is there a better home for it?  Or have I
misjudged our interest in pursuing the work?

If the answer is that there's real work here and we want to do it, then we
can talk about starting a Call For Adoption in Toronto.

Since it's specifically a media types question, I've asked Ned to comment
as well, though I note that Mark Baker is also a DE for media types.

-MSK, co-chairin'

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email