Re: [apps-discuss] draft-santos-smtpgrey-02: SMTP Service Extension for Greylisting Operations

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Tue, 04 February 2014 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0471A01F9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:42:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -94.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FB_WORD1_END_DOLLAR=3.294, FB_WORD2_END_DOLLAR=3.294, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gt3XYmFTYX2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:42:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from news.winserver.com (catinthebox.net [208.247.131.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42611A02D6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:42:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=2426; t=1391492545; h=Received:Received: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject: List-ID; bh=E1v20OhSq5JQAPIJ4IGBmVFLDr0=; b=iaddiQrNp/4Y0fSa//B8 beMnhXy0XancVMotwhnLnqzSPz3w7E3ZAtECf2wq1PHH757HWRGfiMkvGGkeUN0A a9gWn87nLTt2B373WJhCmzpzA+ENopwl+yqzFl+lOH86IvqwW5t+eR0SZEZ1mJIF 9Uu0rXBED/BKzJQ+ZEFeQIs=
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:42:25 -0500
Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; dkim=pass header.d=beta.winserver.com header.s=tms1 header.i=beta.winserver.com; adsp=pass policy=all author.d=isdg.net asl.d=beta.winserver.com;
Received: from beta.winserver.com (hector.wildcatblog.com [208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 775026796.10379.4744; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:42:23 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=beta.winserver.com; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=2426; t=1391491942; h=Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=GkfjI1Y FJhzqmjRmDMVhXLRI3DJ+Su5k0kWCWdFyyRA=; b=mgfcg9qL0L60xXLczqQzcgP wEzQRuEbcOlHqDQOViOBsCIMm/WlZ44aioqfdPeHOVrCLm70628P8NEgdRDh/lu4 lcAU00kDJGgppbHK52w4CRimNqEMrvxquSleR1z2H4Xj/MaV7RG8nRQGavorPj0O G4N5WLSFZsLu22kKKlzY=
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:32:22 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([99.121.4.27]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 221320459.9.6852; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:32:20 -0500
Message-ID: <52F07DBB.9060204@isdg.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:42:19 -0500
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derek Diget <derek.diget+apps-discuss@wmich.edu>
References: <52ED3452.7040007@isdg.net> <CAL0qLwbW=xsrLn_CFg41vy3JRO58cZX7omUhi06HeeGiYuinrw@mail.gmail.com> <52ED3F4B.6060803@isdg.net> <CAL0qLwZcrDqpES+JLzTO1ppq9eOenG10=VCg8p15UxV6wwTJXg@mail.gmail.com> <01P3WDM2RDYG0000CD@mauve.mrochek.com> <Pine.GSO.4.62.1402031703320.2762@spaz.oit.wmich.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.62.1402031703320.2762@spaz.oit.wmich.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-santos-smtpgrey-02: SMTP Service Extension for Greylisting Operations
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:42:43 -0000

Hi Derek, any mail being sent from our clients (Wildcat! SMTP) to 
receivers using Ned's software would honor this assuming 
retry=HH:MM:SS format for scheduling the next (2nd) attempt.


On 2/3/2014 5:24 PM, Derek Diget wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2014 at 22:57 -0800, Ned Freed wrote:
> =>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote:
> =>> > For our own implementation and deployments of WCSMTP.
> =>> >
> =>> > No collections from other packages was made from a client standpoint.
> =>
> =>> Does anyone else have current or planned implementations of this draft
> =>> they'd like to discuss?
> =>
> =>We see greylisting as something best done by a milter, so we're unlikely to
> =>implement direct support in our MTA. That said, a milter has the ability to set
> =>the SMTP response string to anything it wants. The only problem a milter would
> =>have is changing the EHLO response to include the GREYLISTING extension. AFAIK
> =>that is not a milter capability. We have a way to do that outside of milter but
> =>I don't know if other milter-supporting MTAs do.
>
> FYI, we use Ned's software and have the following defined in our
> ORIG_MAIL_ACCESS mapping (based on the Comms Suite Greylisting Wiki page
> at
> <https://wikis.oracle.com/display/CommSuite/Implementing+Greylisting+by+Using+MeterMaid>)
>
> ! Check the source IP address only using the first three octets in the
> ! string passed to MeterMaid, sender (canonicalized via X-CORRESPONDENT
> ! mapping recursion lookup), and recipient in MeterMaid's greylist
> ! table.
> !
> ! If the call to greylisting() returns success, then Messaging Server
> ! should return a temporary rejection. If the call fails, then the
> ! greylisting check has passed and other access control checks can continue
>
>    TCP|$@*|$@*|$D*.$D*.$D*.$@*|$@*|SMTP$@*|MAIL|tcp_mx|*|l|*|true $C$[IMTA_LIB:check_metermaid.so,greylisting,greylist,$0.$1.$2|$|X-CORRESPONDENT;$3||$4]$N$X4.7.1|Temporary$ greylist$ rejection$ -$ retry$ in$ retry=00:03:00$ $E
>
>
> Which causes the following SMTP response:
>
>    451 4.7.1 Temporary greylist rejection - retry in retry=00:03:00 : RECIPIENT@RECIPIENT-DOMAIN
>
>
> I don't have any data on how many clients then following our suggestion.
>
>
> I know we are less than a grain of sand on the mail flow beach, but
> thought that I would speak up as one receiver. :)
>

-- 
HLS