IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer?

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Tue, 11 January 2011 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D0F3A6833 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:26:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UPPERCASE_50_75=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PhIfwwFznVLq for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com (mail-ew0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB47F3A67A8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so9525588ewy.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:28:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.72.197 with SMTP id n5mr5310082faj.8.1294759733835; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.126.212 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:28:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [216.113.201.123]
Received: by 10.223.126.212 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:28:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikuiNC2BmUO06Bg4Dzci7OS84nT91-O-ikK9DJ_@mail.gmail.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1341E73D79@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <AANLkTim_oJ4=y4-_2hQz_sWQLDNLSJSCZQrvUUCO=Vwr@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1101111126290.23807@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <AANLkTikuiNC2BmUO06Bg4Dzci7OS84nT91-O-ikK9DJ_@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:28:53 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinVdmAM775KNAAYMDBuiCc=mnRsKhU27yFHjyAB@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3054a4f90137d1049993be43"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] An XML RFC primer?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:26:41 -0000

Oops yep good catch.
-Tim

On Jan 11, 2011 3:27 AM, "Tony Finch" <dot@dotat.at> wrote:

On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Tim Bray wrote:

> Also see RFC3479 AKA BCP 70.
I think you mean RFC 3470.

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7,
DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR
ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email