Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-00.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 11 May 2011 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319A2E076D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.572, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QGmLKXsVEfAD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99948E089E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxk30 with SMTP id 30so323774yxk.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bkiY3sgWboGfy7ynnscVPXTYgdk7+D18q2+uU8KqstY=; b=Zl+rZ3lk2pGGBu4sAsRHby4eERDuDV3AWpkdRToaRUgkaFP4FnS1Z2ZyT6/1nXpomE PXiQrE7WTyeGx6moDBVPWWrP5yjPjjx/Rb23p88ETD9tNtN9O/XYxzs1x4TuAkSZaLPD PlU/pru6oBaBV7FPl0lHEmIRGZPje4obzhezI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=ZqFPB7HSSuVS1Q85OLOmjAUj5mIrbOR2oyDmXICE9LSFvsL0NV6esqhaCtvzZoOrps SMn7b3Cae2H9yT45XiiWCizP4gr88lWOPK4y1C132CRgkp41rFZChd8MwAE0w2j+R27l bxGfIms9iED/Wa9gDG0JrGY1HyF5/JIASL8H0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.154.199 with SMTP id h47mr11835359yhk.149.1305136908993; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.137.13 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DCAC64D.2090207@dcrocker.net>
References: <20110506220130.29448.74168.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4DC77648.1040903@gmail.com> <8678291D-9406-4BCB-AA41-E0F131B4E38F@vpnc.org> <4DC9499C.1060409@gmail.com> <BANLkTimc-UoTfTs3+Jk5OC0koNK9u243-A@mail.gmail.com> <4DCA6BF1.4010702@gmail.com> <20110511142516.GA4578@crankycanuck.ca> <50B99149-A579-4E96-8C4C-1E86C5B7FC08@afilias.info> <4DCAC64D.2090207@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:01:48 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8bQpP3eCyxNhhNX6u92sms8zCqA
Message-ID: <BANLkTimpPpX418saomOnUz2os88XmTYS2g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:01:50 -0000

> Throughout this thread, people seem to be confusing "verbal" with "oral".

When I suggested "verbal", I specifically meant "in words", not
"oral".  But there's objection to making that change, and I don't
think there's value in messing with the definition in the doc at that
level.

Barry