IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Sat, 12 May 2012 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE7621F8648 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8HAc8-KrYJo6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [173.13.55.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52FE21F863B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BB82722F51; Sat, 12 May 2012 09:30:56 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cbVZNcDwOs2e; Sat, 12 May 2012 09:30:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.8] (unknown [173.13.55.49]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1780A2722F45; Sat, 12 May 2012 09:30:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 09:30:50 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Message-ID: <EF19A50C4CA0480EAD203B35@cyrus.local>
In-Reply-To: <23EDA338-4828-474C-96D4-FA55B187630B@frobbit.se>
References: <20120512025441.33697.qmail@joyce.lan> <23EDA338-4828-474C-96D4-FA55B187630B@frobbit.se>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a3 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; size="881"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 13:30:57 -0000

Hi Patrik,

--On May 12, 2012 7:17:01 AM +0200 Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> 
wrote:

>> I'd think that all we really need is a way for an IMAP client to set
>> or unset a flag or status bit on a message saying that the user
>> considers it to be spam, and the usual IMAP stuff to tell clients that
>> the flag is available.  Once the flag is set, the advice would be to
>> do whatever they do when they get a spam report from a user.  Maybe
>> they move it to another folder, maybe they send an ARF report, but I
>> don't think that needs to be (or even should be) normative.
>
> +1
>
> "Just" agree on a flag being "spam" and let clients and servers innovate
> and be clever.

We already have $Junk and $NotJunk keywords registered: 
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-keywords/imap-keywords.xml>. Perhaps 
a more formal definition of those would help.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email