IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] How we decide (was: Re: Call for Adoption draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Sun, 13 May 2012 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A86A21F8543 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 May 2012 09:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dfDVzPkd-EU4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 May 2012 09:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AEE21F8498 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 May 2012 09:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.26]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 9UUc1j0030as01C01UUcHP; Sun, 13 May 2012 09:28:36 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Xth4yC59 c=1 sm=1 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:17 a=ldJM1g7oyCcA:10 a=_LDBoIrJXYoA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=SClJIqFMAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=Fi-hEsSxoOBWEeYz4_oA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HH8gw8bN0psA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas902.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::54de:dc60:5f3e:334%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Sun, 13 May 2012 09:28:05 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] How we decide (was: Re: Call for Adoption draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap)
Thread-Index: AQHNMPTusQnJo8uLLUSrW3iQ7lp8GJbH6KoQ
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:28:05 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039281202B0@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392811ECBB@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120511165259.09522610@resistor.net> <CAC4RtVAphPhn4HpCkn6=bYcpjV7OPRmx3zMNLiTkffSWjhLgGQ@mail.gmail.com> <5F7401D1EDD86FC7ECE491BC@PST.JCK.COM> <6.2.5.6.2.20120512212108.0903a250@resistor.net> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392811FFC4@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120513020649.0aa455e8@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120513020649.0aa455e8@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [67.160.203.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1336926516; bh=MGzKlZck5menOTzoc520LbkcMsvZt8onP57Q6svVO7k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=hbyAgWxOIK5S5/4WPnlL4mMmMI/11zCU2dzhjJcZEmKFqs+ORXEhIA2Z3DEAXLEpF wiPo6kfmECoteLmlNb7U+yXAvDtV/QzWuDUZcxQmgmD77f91cYAhdcjCS4hhVzi3nJ sH6Bf5ORwFmv9uookwToxOAdP//V5IsB1mIErUG4=
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] How we decide (was: Re: Call for Adoption draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:28:39 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SM [mailto:sm@resistor.net]
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 3:40 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] How we decide (was: Re: Call for Adoption draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap)
> 
> Hi Murray,
> At 01:07 13-05-2012, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> >That's certainly your prerogative, though in my case I would prefer to
> >remain co-operative.  You might not concur with your stance, for
> >example, if the roles one day are
> 
> It is also up to the author(s) to be co-operative.

Certainly.  But I think in this case it was an accidental oversight of your message, not malice or negligence.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email