Re: [apps-discuss] How we decide (was: Re: Call for Adoption draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap)

[SM <[e-mail]>]

At 07:44 12-05-2012, John C Klensin wrote:
>Looking at this from a personal perspective, the number of
>active documents in AppsAWG, whether in discussion for adoption,
>adopted and presumably under development, or in WG or IETF Last

I would like to know "how we decide".  I don't have a strong opinion 
about the matter though.  It's all fine for someone to say that some 
work is worth doing at a meeting.  I know that a number of people 
saying that will be absent when the actual work is being done.

I posted a few comments about one of the WG drafts on May 2.  There 
hasn't been any reply.  I am going to express my discontent during 
the Last Call.  I am not going to "send text" if I get to the 
discontent stage.  Should anyone remind me that it is IETF practice 
to send text, I will say that I am not the one requesting an RFC 
number.  There might be some leading questions as a means to resolve 
the issue(s).  I'll set the good faith level to the IETF median.

In case it is not clear, I am not taking a shot at the WG chairs or 
the ADs; I am not taking a shot at anyone who expressed interest in 
doing some work.

Regards,
-sm