Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and context

mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com> Sun, 26 May 2013 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mca@amundsen.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EEE21F86C3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=2.297, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_38=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TDicqvwCA9LA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAE821F8651 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so2264851wgh.21 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=OaNBt2eduinclQucIuX15fILuuShNZ7CTIkSJE3pR34=; b=KaT2h/k2PEhOnF6fuJp0qO9ZUeA+42dYDZRwIOQmjKetkjPVgq7iRXQ4WIlRwYbkP2 /vjPWIawjRYdxzIkdg0zKH1/9MRHpDZiQib8RBX2TW02ilR3IY3WkDF9nfS9us6mv187 fTzvEN8V7NSoNxVKYLnCdegDtIvfgy9BBwdpXJvLzHvyIRCi7KPcCGo0jgyFUkpqQW0t TMQkFKr74MWx622KvxDRTMwYydw7t+scibpaUK0xe+m/xEANM/7EtECk7A3qdLydN46k /DC2Np4pFcma3AgyR/bx10J47gZ1R5uW6bcwCieZbBPAli6+4IW5hw9dPP72KiSDrBXv HNRw==
X-Received: by 10.194.61.140 with SMTP id p12mr5325321wjr.51.1369568728225; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mca@amundsen.com
Received: by 10.194.239.138 with HTTP; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4038B5FE76874C54A819A07FE192AEF8@gmail.com>
References: <4038B5FE76874C54A819A07FE192AEF8@gmail.com>
From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 07:45:08 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _L7pWZCr4FZ_NbdW854Nymnth30
Message-ID: <CAPW_8m5qdrRZ7fpUwg+N5Z8Gotx_1K4ugrFdwoFAV=4iv5GAZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ioseb Dzmanashvili <ioseb.dzmanashvili@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86de7c8aad4304dd9d9160"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl+Qr5lGdw6L0/ctIEHicUMMF/IT1yWsxvrHdzAf+OqUtc7xRryU07nidnj5KKtiJolhmeR
Cc: link-relations@ieft.org, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and context
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 11:45:30 -0000

How are these different from the "collection" and "item" link relations?

IOW, what can be described by "context" and "property"  that cannot be
described
by "collection" and "item"?


mamund
+1.859.757.1449
skype: mca.amundsen
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com/mamund
https://github.com/mamund
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeamundsen


On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Ioseb Dzmanashvili <
ioseb.dzmanashvili@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Dear All,
>
> I've submitted new draft for the "property" and "context" link relation
> types:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-property-and-context-link-relations-00
>
> Description:
>
> - This specification defines link relation types that may be used to
> express the relationships between a resource and associated properties or
> between a resource and it's context.
> - The "property" and "context" link relations are intentionally generic,
> and they can be used with multiple media types in a wide variety of use
> cases
> - The "property" Link Relation Type: When included in a response, the
> "property" link relation identifies a target resource that represents a
> property of the context resource.
> - The "context" Link Relation Type: When included in a response, the
> "context" link relation identifies a target resource that represents a
> context document of which the context resource is a member.
>
> Could you please review?
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Best regards,
> ioseb
> --
> Ioseb Dzmanashvili
> AzRy LLC
> Software Architect
> #8, Chachava str.
> Tbilisi, 0159, Georgia
> Mobile: +(995) 99753388
> github.com/ioseb
> twitter.com/iosebi
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>