IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Tue, 01 February 2011 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83953A6D00; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:03:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.380, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WRqkHoaCdewV; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03173A6C3D; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so7593766fxm.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:06:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aKwzXhUlB5ZzaTIGRrSy/Fo4rNnoAul23Kmk7TW7fr0=; b=mwZXCfnZ3uqw38sTUkNPXqJidDDO9FGcKqgLaqBnD0nK8nUMpNprMvdy+Ly7WA3lcU ZxkTl5pECxvnNUKPjqn0AcY+azLLegr97pUREVAxBvlI9Z4RH5ZUa/Crix03I197e7gB Ic0RWlYPOh8FNe+uVzr1p6qw5W0h//1pUF6ss=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ay/v2zQ+LzpPHiSPTk0HEcLG4zymUjCTSq6N/O5sAAXLSXkwzD5GEWUm6LXxpv6ifg AgcXVzfeft/jHh8dQcow31o2mt0b8X4pgPA+WUzebp+TotEj1Jg3wmDNZ8d8w5wO1wh0 stgjafEStmwjQhfkwNGZ4xEl3na0Rt9hXXrTE=
Received: by 10.223.95.202 with SMTP id e10mr56021fan.32.1296576368191; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:06:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7sm7926184faa.18.2011.02.01.08.06.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D482F85.1030101@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:06:29 +0200
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, URI <uri@w3.org>
References: <20110201155345.83007.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20110201155345.83007.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:03:14 -0000

01.02.2011 17:53, John Levine wrote:
>> This is like that.  Let's not waste everyone's time.
>> In fact, let's not waste any more time discussing it.
> I certainly see rough consensus (everyone except one) that there is
> nothing to do here.  So I encourage people to resist the urge to
> debate it further.
Dear all,

If there is a rough consensus to remain this scheme Provisional, this 
means that there should be proper specification.  Even RFC 1738 is not 
appropriate here, as it is obsoleted.  Does anyone one want to specify 
this?  The answer is obviously 'no'.  The same answer is to the question 
'Move to Historic?'.  And for 'Do anything else?'

This seems to be a deadlock.  Therefore for I'll contact apps Area 
directors for their final decision.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email