IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...

Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 13 November 2014 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7920A1A0084 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:05:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cxT6tnnfubq4 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:05:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B64041A0072 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r20so6637469wiv.4 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:05:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JpGMBNh3uDZ81dxx52nxA7MXknHnqaAnSl/u3wIDGoY=; b=fs5zO2BnSOQPZqvIhIum70Ok6CgQMOktgIn2ApBPYlrONZMHuCBlOUqbRV2hVTo6s0 0OCg78JUuDG2yAm036/FTD/cAnEb7VHDII6X1AFXvA1ZX9L4IuNND5uldKPPxBu0TyvA UDjcH749hnKVuD8zYhQZQR7pLp8AeS7RPTJM+xTO+g+JPIA6J0NB2XL7Tb5ZH2YWQF7M KHKncQoGKhPhw0S4jSoIYkYxH4VZmIl9usJl4jRQVrS5WN4k36Br953vhh0+ULEcqXFT 38iecEJVyQElvNqRrjUOa5B5BGqsxxBt+UB5gETMP0w5O2LW2Q6kSgQixbtDTfAeYi+z U5zQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.91.137 with SMTP id ce9mr54785061wib.60.1415837132558; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-9bef.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c03700152bc7017f2c6d34113.eduroam.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:152:bc70:17f2:c6d3:4113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ga1sm3469712wib.1.2014.11.12.16.05.30 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5463F5C8.4000004@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:05:28 -1000
From: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
References: <D086F727.B6AF%ropan@cisco.com> <5463F169.6020805@gmail.com> <cf344e47f30e4cd49afa04280b4cbeef@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <cf344e47f30e4cd49afa04280b4cbeef@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/OyVzZULt7SxuJFAeerCndaR5_bM
Subject: Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:05:42 -0000


Am 12.11.14 um 14:03 schrieb Scheffenegger, Richard:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I believe these papers may qualify that requirement:
>
> http://ipv6.cablelabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/DOCSIS-AQM_May2014.pdf
>
>
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6925768
> https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/37381
>
> tl;dr - both pie and codel camps did some independent implementations
> and testing of the respective other algorithm, with discussions and
> denting out some poorly described aspects in that process. It's my
> understanding that this lead to a better quality of the drafts in
> both instances.

Cool & thanks!

   Martin

>
>
>
> Richard Scheffenegger
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message----- From: aqm [mailto:aqm-bounces@ietf.org]
>> On Behalf Of Martin Stiemerling Sent: Mittwoch, 12. November 2014
>> 13:47 To: aqm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...
>>
>> [writing not as AD, but as random IETF participant]
>>
>> Sorry for this blunt question:
>>
>> Is there any other analysis made by an independent source, i.e.,
>> where not the PIE authors are running an analysis of PIE?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Am 10.11.14 um 21:15 schrieb Rong Pan (ropan):
>>> Please see our analysis paper on PIE...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Rong
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list
>>> aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list
>> aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email