[aqm] BoF planning

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 13 May 2013 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBD921F87FB for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 07:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqx3QL2cbcFD for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 07:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob07.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob07.myregisteredsite.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A14821F871D for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 07:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hostingplatform.com ([]) by atl4mhob07.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DElTKN011957 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 10:47:29 -0400
Received: (qmail 27588 invoked by uid 0); 13 May 2013 14:47:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ? (wes@mti-systems.com@ by 0 with ESMTPA; 13 May 2013 14:47:28 -0000
Message-ID: <5190FCF5.20200@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:47:17 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [aqm] BoF planning
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 14:47:35 -0000

For planning an AQM BoF in Berlin, my thought is that
a rather short BoF to beat up the charter and scope of
work is what we'd want.

The problem is pretty well understood, and I don't think
more than a very brief overview is needed for people that
might be interested from other areas.

I don't think we want to deep-dive into algorithms at this
BoF, other than to show that they are becoming an active
area of work again, that drafts are being brought to the
IETF, and that there is interest in getting them done as
IETF-stream RFCs.

In other words, one of the shorter timeslots should
suffice, I think.

Wes Eddy
MTI Systems