[arch-d] Internet and Architecture as Art

[Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]>]

Dear All,

Ching F.D.K's "Architecture: Form, Space and Order" made no detail on what
art is. If art is understood as a way of questioning on beauty and of
provoking imagination: supposedly he meant those elements of art to worked
out by those form, space and order in collaboration.

There was "an architecture of signature" in relation with networked city
(Castells, M., "Networked City: Resaux, espace, societe) supposedly
concerning with network art.

While in relation with the computer as a machine, supposedly "cyber" and
"network" provide us with such nuances of the same thing: such
communication and control of network system of machine. Thus we may say
"cyber-network art"...

In a society of flexible network of language game, "postmodern art"
represents an enthusiasm to affirm non-presence --examplified by those
works of Marcel Proust and James Joyce (Lyotard, J.F, "What is
Postmodernism" in "The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, 1989
--while I red on its Indonesian version").

Regarding with the network of language game we may look at a situation of
"technological context of man made possible by language" so that man could
think of the Internet in relation with art, city and space . So it was said
by Bolhuis, J. et all, "How Could Language Have Evolved"? p. 6)

 http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/90974

http://dspace.mit.edu/openaccess-disseminate/1721.1/90974



Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Sabtu, 04 Mei 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]> menulis:

> Dear All,
>
> Discourses on "Network" and Architecture.
>
> The Internet: the interconnected networks...
>
> Architecture is itself understood as art and science of  building; design
> or style of building (Oxford English Dictionary, "Green Yellow" edition).
> While "network" as complex system of lines that cross; connected system
> (ibid).
>
> There was an etymology of "network" attempted by Brigg, K. (2004/2005)
>
> www.uvm.edu/pdodds/files/papers/others/2005/*briggs*2005a.pdf
>
> Today among others we find the English terms work in human cultures --with
> their translations in other languages...
>
> In science we find the term "network" in computer science, social science,
> and even an emerging scientific discipline of network science.
>
> "Advanced Network Architecture"
>
> http://groups.csail.mit.edu/ana/Publications/index.html
>
> "Informationalism, Technology and Network Society"
>
> https://annenberg.usc.edu/sites/default/files/2015/04/28/Inf
> ormationalism%2C%20Networks%20and%20the%20Network%20Society.pdf
>
>
> "Network Science"
>
> http://networkscience.com
>
> As a combination of science and art, concerning with buliding houses and
> the like and the related ones, architecture recognizes "network" as part of
> configuring paths that connect established points in space (Ching, F.D.K,
> 2007, p. 265).
>
>
> Regard,
> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>
> Pada Kamis, 02 Mei 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]> menulis:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> (I missed to attach the web address below...)
>>
>> "The design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols" (Clarck, D.D,
>> (1988/1995?))
>>
>> http://groups.csail.mit.edu/ana/Publications/PubPDFs/The%20d
>> esign%20philosophy%20of%20the%20DARPA%20internet%20protocols.pdf
>>
>> Regard,
>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>
>> Pada Kamis, 02 Mei 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]> menulis:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>>
>>> We may say that "architecture" is about "spaces formed according to
>>> ordering principles...".
>>>
>>> "Cyberspace" in "Tussle in Cyberspace..." I mentioned earlier was about
>>> the Internet itself in which interests living...
>>>
>>> Meanwhile "cyberorder" is supposedly what was concerned by the RFC 1958
>>> "Architectural Principles of the Internet": connectivity, Internet
>>> protocol, and end-to-end intellegence.
>>>
>>> So what is supposedly the stylistic forms suggested by those
>>> "cyberspace" and "cyberorders"...--may we say that it is about "net" as it
>>> is about interconnected networks, or the Internet...?
>>>
>>> "The design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols" (Clarck, D.D,
>>> (1988/1995?))
>>>
>>> with a historical note on the Internet Architecture RFC 3869 (2004).
>>>
>>> Here, if we may, may we say about network architecture as art --of which
>>> the Internet currently understood as computer-based networks of
>>> communications is part...? --as Ching, F.D.K used as illustrations on his
>>> concept of "network" in his architectural reading "Architecture: Form,
>>> Space, and Order" (2007)...?
>>>
>>> Regard,
>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>>
>>> Pada Selasa, 30 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]>
>>> menulis:
>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Cyberspace", tussle and the evolution of the network's technical
>>>> architecture: it is in "Tussle in Cyberspace: Defining Tomorrow's Internet"
>>>> (Clarck, D. D et all, IEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2005)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.csail.mit.edu/ana/Publications/PubPDFs/Tussle%
>>>> 20in%20Cyberspace%20Defining%20Tomorrows%20Internet%202005's
>>>> %20Internet.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Regard,
>>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>>>
>>>> Pada Selasa, 30 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]>
>>>> menulis:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To say "Architecture: Form, Space and Order": would it be legitimated
>>>>> to say "The Internet Architecture: Form, Space and Order"...? --thus it is
>>>>> about "Cyber Form, Cyber Space, and Cyber Order"...?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> An article supposedly guides a reading journey:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.espacestemps.net/articles/cyber-geography-research/
>>>>>
>>>>> The hypertext-linked address suggested (http://www.cybergeography.org)
>>>>> brought us to this page:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/m.dodge/cybergeography/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regard,
>>>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Pada Kamis, 18 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]>
>>>>> menulis:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I wish that I do not repeate what were ever talked with in this
>>>>>> [e-mail].)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we may say about "Architecture" is/as "Art" --regarding what
>>>>>> Francis D.K. Ching said in his "Architecture: Form, Space and Order", John
>>>>>> Wiley & Sons Inc, 2007, p. IX--, then "Internet Architecture" is/as
>>>>>> "Internet Art".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thus supposedly this research --I finded out in such a "Library
>>>>>> Tour"-- may work for the connection:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ".art: Situating Internet Art in the Traditional Institution of
>>>>>> Contemporary Art" by Karen A. Verschooren (MIT, 2007)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/39149
>>>>>>
>>>>>> discussing key players, institutions, and discourses on aesthetics,
>>>>>> economy, and exhibition methodologies to frame a sociological analysis...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Based on the definitions of Steve Dietz and Alexander Galloway and
>>>>>> inspired by Lisa
>>>>>> Gitelman's understanding of protocols, I will thus in this volume
>>>>>> define Internet art as
>>>>>> that set of artworks, which uses Internet technology for its creation
>>>>>> and presentation, and
>>>>>> is characterized by a play with protocols, be they technical,
>>>>>> economic, social or cultural". p.21
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regard,
>>>>>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note: To the matter I also ever sent the message to Information
>>>>>> Architecture Community Group "Information, Architecture, and Art (April
>>>>>> 18th 2019).
>>>>>>
>>>>>