Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...))

Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> Fri, 06 June 2003 00:21 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23347 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:21:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h560KcB24709 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:20:38 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h560KcB24706 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:20:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23343; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:20:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O4wN-0004sy-00; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:18:43 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O4wM-0004sv-00; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:18:42 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h560B2B24401; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:11:02 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h560AWB24382 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:10:32 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23157 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:10:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O4mb-0004pz-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:08:37 -0400
Received: from pcls1.std.com ([199.172.62.103] helo=TheWorld.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O4ma-0004pw-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:08:36 -0400
Received: from world.std.com (mreddin@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by TheWorld.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h560AKsG002223; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:10:25 -0400
Received: (from bzs@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA11322; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:10:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16095.56299.311912.582535@world.std.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Cc: Peter Kay <peter@titankey.com>, asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...))
In-Reply-To: <189362475782.20030605152312@brandenburg.com>
References: <DD198B5D07F04347B7266A3F35C42B0B0FD02B@io.cybercom.local> <189362475782.20030605152312@brandenburg.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:10:19 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Re: what is bulk etc

To some extent what we need here is an actual legal scholar.

The law is full of problems like this where a specific act is colored
by intent making it slippery to define.

Not surprisingly, a lot of fraud has this quality. The same exact set
of actions can be a serious criminal fraud in one case and completely
innocent in another, depending upon what can be discerned about
intent.

The legal term is "mens rea", the state of mind of the perpetrator at
the time of the act, what was their goal, could they reasonably
foresee the result of their actions, etc.

This is why we're going round and round on the term "bulk", we're
trying to make the term (or the phrase UBE) describe the mens rea of
the sender.

Potentially difficult, but the law has wrestled with similar
definitional issues for many hundreds of years.

That said, I think the usual framework used by the legal system is to
create a brief set of "tests", essentially a form one might fill out
describing a perp's actions in terms of a set of (one hopes) carefully
constructed questions, usually standardized by some rather broad-based
process like a bunch of law faculty and judges, much like a technical
standard in spirit.

The problem with that approach is it makes for boring press &
soundbites and it takes some experience and discipline to construct
(again, like technical standards.)

Another problem is the clash of disciplines, law in my limited
experience tends to be enumerative and synthetic, give them more
examples they add more clauses (the ten commandments ceased being the
whole of the law a long time ago), while engineering and science tends
to be analytic, there's a goal to reduce all the cases to a simple
rule or two, E=MC^2 and all that (or, for the musically inclined, E=Fb).

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD
The World              | Public Access Internet     | Since 1989     *oo*
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg