Re: to/cc/bcc extension

James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Wed, 03 November 2010 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C580D28C0F8 for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.985, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7MY+1XDgUQw for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6EE3A6AC6 for <atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA3EsKF9047763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:54:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id oA3EsKsa047762; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:54:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail-qw0-f43.google.com (mail-qw0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA3EsJuW047755 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:54:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jasnell@gmail.com)
Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so110487qwj.16 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OyFgre2ti5dYZ4QOTbv2m95kPLc7tDaaywZPKaciqKo=; b=bLJiSFArnnksu3NrsUmMK9b6p1M9LhCA4WOCYzPb+W6Dii1WOVZTEY+RO96ysx+A79 LnRayD1kTYaa+5uEDQnuKlSCD8K8L497HNvP3KVs4D3qYVfHrQap3SQ6ESgSUhu3Tfh2 WoF+FF5SnqtBJI9DZX5ToQyzQbW0fqZ8698XY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DJAQqE99945tT9jkI/AivRxMOA+NLINGbsiPbfe5XD1Wcpts6w5nLozYakZJ+pMom+ kOf6YkyTgb5OYwGPgpMJ3O8beLa4HReNoPZxrhuVr7ELPx5FmkwS8qoD591s6Q/T54PZ mGRaOx/wcn96DlH0LXJHXJOV5UiBtXFn4m4S4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.189.197 with SMTP id df5mr2643322qcb.223.1288796058173; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.54.202 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20101103143331.GB16326@klangraum.plasmasturm.org>
References: <AANLkTi=P5k0LpVxB-Q4HqeM+zZsHfoXrDuEbGZxX7PSU@mail.gmail.com> <20101025195219.GP29843@klangraum.plasmasturm.org> <AANLkTin4CGUjcX+b_yiSNsAzR06246bR6AtBY4bjjxtU@mail.gmail.com> <20101103143331.GB16326@klangraum.plasmasturm.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:54:18 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=3uX+UaUdrnZagpTyTaUrtcedbWV_tD0Q0Sdm6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: to/cc/bcc extension
From: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
To: atom-syntax@imc.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00163630f1ab3c44bf0494273730"
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>

The value of the to/cc/bcc elements is any valid IRI. It can be an email
address or it can be anything else really. We could add an optional label
attribute to each of the elements but I'm not certain it's necessary.

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de>wrote:

>
> * James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> [2010-10-25 22:10]:
> > Aristotle, the email application messed up the markup... it's
> > supposed to be just...
> >
> >   <to> acct: john.doe @ example.org </to>
> >
> > (I added some spaces to try to keep the example from being
> > messed up again)
>
> I see; my “ick” reaction to micro-parsing is hereby withdrawn.
>
> Still it doesn’t change my counterproposal. Are you sure you will
> under no circumstances ever want display name to show a user? And
> that email is the pinnacle of, the one true form of, electronic
> identity?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
>
>