Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9448 <draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-13> for your review

Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> Thu, 10 August 2023 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDF2C16B5A3; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_hjTy1CVHQi; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B3FC16B5A0; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E68424B42D; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y4HFDLcwBGdn; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2600:1700:bac0:1070:915e:ced7:2112:c3d3] (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:bac0:1070:915e:ced7:2112:c3d3]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28D70424B426; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM7yphZ6Rytd1HOZbBgvCF+kBrd-n+GU_9UUsdFWEkxFVe5NGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:52:45 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, chris-ietf@chriswendt.net, mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, acme-ads@ietf.org, acme-chairs@ietf.org, rsalz@akamai.com, rdd@cert.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0AF4BE7B-1FF5-4D27-8429-37D6B67042BB@amsl.com>
References: <20230725055638.DCF7D3E8AF@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CAM7yphYR6XEdAX+yemh+eAWPtb1cdWcxO2rRabviYMCBhZ88FA@mail.gmail.com> <5FEA6AD0-3599-4C24-8317-776DA3CD05E3@amsl.com> <CAM7yphZ6Rytd1HOZbBgvCF+kBrd-n+GU_9UUsdFWEkxFVe5NGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Hancock <davidhancock.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/5FsmRuJwPN348uFDHxE7ThFxEFo>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9448 <draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-13> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:52:50 -0000

Hi David,

We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9448

Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Aug 9, 2023, at 11:17 PM, David Hancock <davidhancock.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alanna,
> 
> Thanks for the updates -- I now approve this RFC for publication.
> 
> David
> 
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 2:59 PM Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> Thank you for your reply. Your affiliation has been updated.
> 
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.xml
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.txt
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.pdf
> 
> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)
> 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9448
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
> > On Aug 9, 2023, at 10:16 AM, David Hancock <davidhancock.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > I would like to update my company name from Comcast to Somos Inc. in two places...
> > 
> > ---
> > On title page authors list:
> > 
> > OLD:
> > old text
> >   D. Hancock
> >   Comcast
> > 
> > NEW:
> > new text
> >   D. Hancock
> >   Somos Inc.
> > 
> > On the last page list of Authors' Addresses
> > OLD:
> > old text
> >    David Hancock
> >    Comcast
> >    United States of America
> >    Email: 
> > davidhancock.ietf@gmail.com
> > NEW:
> > new text
> >    David Hancock
> >    Somos Inc.
> >    United States of America
> >    Email: 
> > davidhancock.ietf@gmail.com
> > ---
> > 
> > Thanks
> > David
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 11:56 PM <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> > *****IMPORTANT*****
> > 
> > Updated 2023/07/24
> > 
> > RFC Author(s):
> > --------------
> > 
> > Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> > 
> > Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and 
> > approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.  
> > If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies 
> > available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
> > 
> > You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties 
> > (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing 
> > your approval.
> > 
> > Planning your review 
> > ---------------------
> > 
> > Please review the following aspects of your document:
> > 
> > *  RFC Editor questions
> > 
> >    Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor 
> >    that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as 
> >    follows:
> > 
> >    <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> > 
> >    These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> > 
> > *  Changes submitted by coauthors 
> > 
> >    Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your 
> >    coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you 
> >    agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> > 
> > *  Content 
> > 
> >    Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot 
> >    change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
> >    - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
> >    - contact information
> >    - references
> > 
> > *  Copyright notices and legends
> > 
> >    Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
> >    RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions 
> >    (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
> > 
> > *  Semantic markup
> > 
> >    Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of  
> >    content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode> 
> >    and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at 
> >    <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
> > 
> > *  Formatted output
> > 
> >    Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the 
> >    formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is 
> >    reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting 
> >    limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> > 
> > 
> > Submitting changes
> > ------------------
> > 
> > To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all 
> > the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties 
> > include:
> > 
> >    *  your coauthors
> > 
> >    *  rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (the RPC team)
> > 
> >    *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., 
> >       IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the 
> >       responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
> > 
> >    *  auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, which is a new archival mailing list 
> >       to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion 
> >       list:
> > 
> >      *  More info:
> >         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
> > 
> >      *  The archive itself:
> >         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
> > 
> >      *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out 
> >         of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
> >         If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you 
> >         have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, 
> >         auth48archive@rfc-editor.org will be re-added to the CC list and 
> >         its addition will be noted at the top of the message. 
> > 
> > You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> > 
> > An update to the provided XML file
> >  — OR —
> > An explicit list of changes in this format
> > 
> > Section # (or indicate Global)
> > 
> > OLD:
> > old text
> > 
> > NEW:
> > new text
> > 
> > You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit 
> > list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> > 
> > We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
> > beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, 
> > and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in 
> > the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
> > 
> > 
> > Approving for publication
> > --------------------------
> > 
> > To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
> > that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
> > as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> > 
> > 
> > Files 
> > -----
> > 
> > The files are available here:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.xml
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.html
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.pdf
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.txt
> > 
> > Diff file of the text:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448-diff.html
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> > 
> > Diff of the XML: 
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448-xmldiff1.html
> > 
> > The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own 
> > diff files of the XML.  
> > 
> > Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.original.v2v3.xml 
> > 
> > XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates 
> > only: 
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9448.form.xml
> > 
> > 
> > Tracking progress
> > -----------------
> > 
> > The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
> >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9448
> > 
> > Please let us know if you have any questions.  
> > 
> > Thank you for your cooperation,
> > 
> > RFC Editor
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC9448 (draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-13)
> > 
> > Title            : TNAuthList profile of ACME Authority Token
> > Author(s)        : C. Wendt, D. Hancock, M. Barnes, J. Peterson
> > WG Chair(s)      : Deb Cooley, Deb Cooley, Yoav Nir
> > Area Director(s) : Roman Danyliw, Paul Wouters
> > 
> > 
>