Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9324 <draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-08> for your review

[Randy Bush <[e-mail]>]

rebecca:

> What do you think about adding the following at the end of Section 2?
> Or is another location in the document better? (Note that we will ask
> the AD to approve added text.)
>   
>    Note that the term "RPKI-based Route Origin Validation" in
>    this document means the same as the term "Prefix Origin Validation"
>    used in [RFC6811].

fine

>>> 8) <!-- [rfced] Terminology
>>> 
>>> a) We note inconsistencies in the terms listed below. We chose the
>>> form on the right. Please let us know any objections.
>>> 
>>> Route Server vs. route server Note: The lowercase form is used in
>>>  RFC 7947 and is more common in the RFC Series.
>>> 
>>> BGP Speaker vs. BGP speaker
>>> 
>>> 
>>> b) We see instances of both "Route Refresh" (capitalized) and "route
>>> refresh" (lowercase) in the document. Should the capitalization be
>>> consistent? Please review and let us know if any updates are needed.
>>> -->

you seem to favor lower case, so fine

randy