Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9324 <draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-08> for your review

[Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]>]

Hello authors and Warren,

Keyur and Warren, we have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9324).

We have all needed approvals, so we will move this document forward in the publication process at this time.

Thank you,
RFC Editor/rv



> On Dec 13, 2022, at 10:44 AM, Keyur Patel <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> LGTM as well. 😊
>  
> Best Regards,
> Keyur
>  
> From: Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>
> Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 6:43 AM
> To: Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Randy Bush <[e-mail]>, Keyur Patel <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]<[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, RFC Editor <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, Chris Morrow <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9324 <draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-08> for your review
> 
>  
>  
>  
>  
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 2:12 PM, Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hi Randy and *AD,
> Randy, thank you for the reply. We have updated the document. All of our questions have now been addressed. Please contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the publication process.
> *Warren, as AD, please review and approve the added text in Section 2. This change is best viewed in this diff file: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324-auth48diff.html.
>  
>  
> LGTM.
> W
>  
>  
>  
> Updated XML file: 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324.xml
> Updated output files: 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324.txt 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324.pdf 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324.html
> Diff file showing changes made during AUTH48: 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324-auth48diff.html
> Diff files showing all changes: 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324-rfcdiff.html (side-by-side diff) 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9324
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/rv
> On Dec 7, 2022, at 11:14 AM, Randy Bush <[e-mail]> wrote:
> rebecca:
> What do you think about adding the following at the end of Section 2? Or is another location in the document better? (Note that we will ask the AD to approve added text.)
> Note that the term "RPKI-based Route Origin Validation" in this document means the same as the term "Prefix Origin Validation" used in [RFC6811].
> fine
> 8) <!-- [rfced] Terminology
> a) We note inconsistencies in the terms listed below. We chose the form on the right. Please let us know any objections.
> Route Server vs. route server Note: The lowercase form is used in RFC 7947 and is more common in the RFC Series.
> BGP Speaker vs. BGP speaker
> b) We see instances of both "Route Refresh" (capitalized) and "route refresh" (lowercase) in the document. Should the capitalization be consistent? Please review and let us know if any updates are needed. 
> --> 
> you seem to favor lower case, so fine
> randy
> [EXTERNAL]