IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9324 <draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-08> for your review

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Fri, 09 December 2022 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18657C14CE50; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:06:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUsWZgfJPvL0; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 474B7C14CF06; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2A34243E6F; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:06:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NaNXxXvkfbef; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:518d:be8d:e429:338b] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:518d:be8d:e429:338b]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9965424FFEC; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2edt99002.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 12:06:23 -0800
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, sidrops-ads@ietf.org, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <883E2239-8E7F-4E41-A50A-6954E4851621@amsl.com>
References: <20221027190446.EBB7155D3E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <m2o7shbnkh.wl-randy@psg.com> <231AFC66-0957-4C1C-9F01-C7B6711E647D@amsl.com> <m2359r9gcn.wl-randy@psg.com> <99FF6A69-CF26-42AA-9F2D-AA77E859DC23@amsl.com> <m2edt99002.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, pfsinoz@gmail.com, mark@tinka.africa, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/NWrM0sHqAqd5w33tHmQ2dX8-ne4>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9324 <draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-08> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:06:28 -0000

Hi Randy,

Thanks for the note. I went through the document again, and I believe that all the instances of which/that adhere to CMS style. 

Let us know if any other updates are needed. Once we receive approval from all authors and the AD, we’ll move this document forward in the publication process.

——————————

Updated XML file:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324.xml

Updated output files:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324.txt
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324.pdf
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324.html

Diff file showing changes made during AUTH48:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324-auth48diff.html

Diff files showing all changes:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324-diff.html
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9324-rfcdiff.html (side-by-side diff)

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9324

Thank you,

RFC Editor/rv


> On Dec 8, 2022, at 11:19 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
> rebecca
> 
> i was merely maintaining my snarky position on CMS.  if you want
> /which/that/ i will survive; though i reserve the right to picket
> your table again.
> 
> randy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email