IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review

Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com> Tue, 06 February 2024 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <arusso@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74DEC151524; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:09:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hkcfPL7SZpmt; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618CCC151093; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52961424CD01; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:09:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pRz5zoQXPsXI; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-76-146-133-47.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [76.146.133.47]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15E75424B432; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <EADE7D3F22B9A9A609A0CFBD@PSB>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:09:36 -0800
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E8C235E0-86A3-4D90-A36B-6D43C5A81B18@amsl.com>
References: <20240109070859.359DF143F5A4@rfcpa.amsl.com> <8B5031F1A7B9BFE6E03BC7D8@PSB> <4DFBB3E1-CF4B-4AA5-A3EE-0E030313A578@amsl.com> <55385513FB5A04E9A6C49F16@PSB> <B9E15453-3149-40FF-AE82-77711D178443@amsl.com> <B5263C13-79E0-4826-A7AF-07EE7B2EC2E0@amsl.com> <CAL0qLwaOKWiB+y63MrUqmHds0fJ31n=3mGmbkV2s_wpFbOcmAg@mail.gmail.com> <0A59191E-212F-4C36-ADC4-A840B5F9118C@amsl.com> <EADE7D3F22B9A9A609A0CFBD@PSB>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/ga0iH4Vhws5igvKt-F3_Uq4Bf_M>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 18:09:41 -0000

John,
Thank you for you reply. The document has been updated accordingly (please refresh), e.g., https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9422-lastrfcdiff.html (which shows only the most recent update).

This page shows the AUTH48 status: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9422
We will continue with the publication process at this time.

Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar

> On Feb 5, 2024, at 11:36 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> Alice,
> 
> Yes, by all means.  Sorry for not catching that myself.  And
> thanks for the updated instructions to IANA as well.
> 
>   john
> 
> 
> --On Monday, February 5, 2024 11:27 -0800 Alice Russo
> <arusso@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
>> Murray, 
>> Thanks for your reply. We have noted your approval on the
>> AUTH48 page for this document
>> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9422). 
>> 
>> John, 
>> Another question:  Is it OK to change to all-caps "MAIL
>> Parameters" to match how it appears on the IANA page
>> (https://www.iana.org/assignments/mail-parameters)?  We
>> typically aim for the document to match the IANA page as
>> closely as possible; my mistake for missing this earlier.
>> 
>> Section 7.2
>> 
>> OLD: The IANA has created a new registry in the Mail
>> Parameters group for ... NEW: The IANA has created a new
>> registry in the "MAIL Parameters" group for ...
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> RFC Editor/ar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email