Re: [babel] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 19 May 2021 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31293A19BF; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id doOLuOjCZd5n; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A8D3A19BE; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id l15so5770597iln.8; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vw5o5uA9rTGySutYiOizz/A1QE13vnscopzzmK0z7dg=; b=dpKznIK8jXIuWhfCkiPDfCpZQ8P1I2i4X6uj1zsT8l3qhrsnDdx3DCxYqAb3DLn+wW JRwm2d0K0PCSza4IMpRu0tHq1GbT0i+tV0YAme7CVewJNdwmL7EimasBsHZh45Vhnlmv 3zv6dBn+ZQY+jLVn8WYdcOr12wu9toHfGGzq1e0v0t1BJJK1LxCiCqjZB+lhbCYK5ZRs Fmqd0On4ak1zGcq0KXSo2vQqColBJLrlo6zJ2lIsbN8shPYkN77t5DOIEIzxtzNgkKCi werCXj7u3wS0vKsAEif2OXB9U1lmvuOIFjFxcHc5YXLGYgEN+j8BThKJ1l1KpztVm9nC hUEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vw5o5uA9rTGySutYiOizz/A1QE13vnscopzzmK0z7dg=; b=YjKjPdGt0JAUQn16ISCQQGkTo5g9clxq2FJQSipwZf/6fLW2IAYz8eFoLaKard02kP Wjv+wbdE2vlV+FRBCWpWQ06pY7jsZx7VRrwVYFXLNq0kmfbVsrBUjz6RhRFuEypNceZx 1ewdoU4jag1qRfZv6GGyWOAvpHbgy+IFpVF6arVrO5X9q97+IRRUfzJFmFPibtEjP6ma 5x4epj23BneKriwp31jCTxb44WxwlchECrBzVBAtdGRl56lufuvBltwWxf1F3z0PVCaO XnMQOW5XEt2y3RGzPnVZwEKS4NBILtrqqHO8gCLy6veYhZ01ruXjiZLF4rqcgARngE4l hvdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531K4qab4UT44Jc7KjBieyoxJcDENy0IXbovzT6X7lxw3yK3VtaO bZGNakVmhuKO/c8M6/1nDZjvI8+fG9lGvyS0tLpq49iGCiRohQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8tcZHXRfW/CDcr64JCluKg1W50S0guvO38WSO0uNhNdFRjFUV7hlMGkxqGX3R6UiEZCHoy4rbXWWq0iRF8Jo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1b83:: with SMTP id h3mr7011046ili.199.1621391375403; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162124475990.8618.15255310968103028424@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <162124475990.8618.15255310968103028424@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 22:29:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHO5TGRrpp97uVa_39S+AwnLMK2jGsU-cWf_xKLo_SYGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tl?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-babel-yang-model@ietf.org, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/-dLg8JQiGPkDjfrIX55MmQu2_dQ>
Subject: Re: [babel] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_Discuss_on_draft-ietf-bab?= =?utf-8?q?el-yang-model-10=3A_=28with_DISCUSS_and_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 02:29:42 -0000

Hi Éric,

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:46 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
<noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-10: Discuss
> ...
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ...
> Thank you to Donald Eastlake for his shepherd's write-up (including the WG
> consensus).

You're welcome.

> ...
> -éric
>
> == DISCUSS ==
> ...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> == COMMENTS ==
> ...
>
> -- Section 5 --
> Is there any reason why the doc shepherd is not acknowledged ?

I don't feel any need to be listed in the acknowledgements. While I
did do the Shepherd write up (PROTO), I really don't recall making any
suggestions for change to this draft which is by two experienced
authors. My general policy, when I am an author, is to acknowledge
people whose comments resulted in technical or substantial editorial
changes, If the Shepherd should be listed just because they are the
Shepherd then why shouldn't the Chair(s) and AD be listed in the
Acknowledgements?

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com