Re: [babel] BABEL / MANET / ROLL and multicast

Call it MABEL?

On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:58 PM Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with Juliusz. MANET seems like the more general umbrella for some sort of joint MANET/BABEL(/ROLL) meeting.
>
> I don't know what the process is for getting a joint slot for >1 WG in the agenda. It's probably something like one of them requesting a slot in the usual way and then the joint participants requesting it be re-labeled as joint.
>
> In the next day or two I'll probably indicate that the BABEL as such will not meet at the July IETF meeting. I notice that neither MANET or ROLL has yet requested a meeting slot.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 5:26 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
>>
>> > In practical terms, who would request the session slot, BABEL or MANET?
>>
>> I think it would be better to put it under the MANET umbrella, so it
>> doesn't look like we're aiming for a Babel-specific solution.  I fear that
>> both RFC 9079 and RFC 9229 are being overlooked by the community because
>> they are (erroneously) perceived as being specific to Babel.
>>
>> -- Juliusz
>
> _______________________________________________
> babel mailing list
> babel@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel

-- 
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC