Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
Neeraj Malhotra <neeraj.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 January 2020 22:01 UTC
Return-Path: <neeraj.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D5F1200EF; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:01:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BFBtWu_hx0QD; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23F22120018; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 66so13590538otd.9; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:01:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AtMTqSr52UBNaT/fdBgyu8oPh3K7mmOMaHx9Fwy4Okc=; b=cJvi4mO/l7QAeV2WfUxjTyUXfw9xAUSROaxAkLEJfYAwlBqHMMtfyr73WuTvCLQMN5 jU5/Z01mum3MNZOcsTxTMrjTdjU338oG/wKZxJqPosbx1zxtz5YdHSEvqSIXRjUtW6V2 KrykBxFykmT4yVgWuxwc1XQ4HyIGMR/S5RBPZmdn7LBKZh7GZ3pH6XsqP0KHG4u3H8ZD akzoIWddtQQiD0bYYT91c0EfYkpdAUqFqJD8VqbGuvOTEs9fglNyV/XPzVHyOwaAEvz6 Rn0ytRZmUcWDgiXB3kRswsa3yTqDkfvlxlAdibyhJOpkZJMPLtHqWMPgTIfmtqmmzArk g0bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AtMTqSr52UBNaT/fdBgyu8oPh3K7mmOMaHx9Fwy4Okc=; b=bu1eN5xaZcz6VZ2+noGcYuvG+X2zDpbF/HZ0+FvUJCcckaiYsa2JycFUsmzKAIWpWq eKW5Njw1UtcRn6JSQx/wO1CynmPvYiPBCyscwP7vpJtti3Pbb8XG887lgf93NmhUlkAE slHxKtRQiA0uZA58lLGQTMvCEcJ4KkT/XP9IiZTtwZ6pXB1gYi4PWdwug+fPlKM8aCR9 Ca81tyEHzySOWaDsPcubr+cuKg0EQQQP0e0xeU1dEaupfCmqHI83WmhumtE4c6M4mv1m l5ALnkPMfCQ4LbCs8xF3aCIZvJ+3OWUyvd86bHEFFCfJLLw5eUMgOyRUduY6zIbGT4hd G5mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUqVH3vKKQFfI1Q1q2PiNuGjvTbWnj4+MJ4ZqsHvWbIh3Vc3+N6 0ortizaQzIxSlp19L/sQ5SX8wZWM7i/O2z7uDd8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuN5rUV5oEAOZG+Dhb0sMFQq7DINCITc4jRV2GCksYwx3ZtFoSCQFLbCnpBEy0QzVi8HM8NmnfeZyEl+r/7vM=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76cb:: with SMTP id p11mr18580223otl.7.1580248866486; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:01:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <013601d5cd13$fceb7620$f6c26260$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <013601d5cd13$fceb7620$f6c26260$@gmail.com>
From: Neeraj Malhotra <neeraj.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:00:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAF3QiHHJwn_5u30i5fTqqmBXuhmZqORitm64oQx_8dD+cSYwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000057ff15059d3a5cfd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/-IqHR09fz2j_gYyuoUlJ7eDXEho>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:01:10 -0000
Hi, Support as co-author. Not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Neeraj On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > > > This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 > [2] > > > > Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, > please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track > RFC. > > > > This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019. > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > There is currently no IPR disclosed. > > We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please > indicate if you are aware of any implementations. > > Thank you, > > Stephane > > > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw > > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/ >
- [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for dra… slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… LINGALA, AVINASH
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… John E Drake
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Samir Thoria (sthoria)
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Krishna Muddenahally Ananthamurthy (kriswamy)
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Neeraj Malhotra
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for… Gyan Mishra