Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Mon, 10 February 2020 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D0F120045; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 21:40:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nkDy8BxHPBpl; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 21:40:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D352E120020; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 21:40:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id c16so6193199ioh.6; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 21:40:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Pj2Us5I7TzBS3k6tLBg3t4qNTr8rguuyWPSLpnM82Ds=; b=gmTJei/AOJbZbnNQk6crMH5RH/vQ2y9srSwVwH+bTefFcH5xaYEwQm5FzLBeLmIguH igjoRg/gvOe5BH3GcYARJSsywGMLfoVwJnvUJ6wyRCwFUFKtY1gRvrKN9Cj0SsPLfs3A I7mj/GFqd0X7EUsRFEctlke7ZBaE/ZecDL1wrNAGBqUgfzHC9Cpm87NLL2Bozgv+mDcr UdX1vANfBuRwbwBoLN9GAdtzCTa4cUqP73jU97BQWArCmY96xu9lrloHHaRB2lXF1K9x KyldQYufD2CjsYU4RA+TEKCwQFh+eImyBdLUcyJIDeLBUR/TUzHUu1Z1sPwNXuXvFS1h LNXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Pj2Us5I7TzBS3k6tLBg3t4qNTr8rguuyWPSLpnM82Ds=; b=ovuTK6ENtrP15QzmlscvzZi1Lu72i5h0PiTTme7qvgcBmxBrXf8RHE44CPwJY9K1lF urUV7hPk4zLd0YZQJAXBtWw8G1LdKI4pXN+k80TnYBY6c+eGmLbyUeJs20DbD6FLzcAr EYnoQTNHykYPQh6hOZjpG2bfUND320vi+OXzMS5oe/gSsnfbQjse0ZOXBcKrQpahaHxV Ge0MwybHWgGDyWqLG25oMJGOmWKZxdl3UlzX/BJg5y4m2jO2tWsqbySciGx8/u56ExBE P4rBW4NACreVbFtzzDP/wNCUWVgfr6ZK9zBQJ2vvpJtaz1eb+eXKCGtBVO/muAetRiaw QkNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXh+nCi/hJ0uvz3U3e7fpX8hbLw0jGqXljVHZlxSB007i+Spafx rxMjc4NGKhmh1bY6lzD25JFqbpDMKLLqviR3WR0JwyA8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1CQd9d1XgwSp9x5nXGhgBQMOi9l3PiV31VCyVNqpUGGSoALPwDCCeXyXXvg7ApCGfaZLscT4eK9slHsoqKkM=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8505:: with SMTP id i5mr7599367ioj.158.1581313202903; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 21:40:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <013601d5cd13$fceb7620$f6c26260$@gmail.com> <00cd01d5db62$924e7170$b6eb5450$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <00cd01d5db62$924e7170$b6eb5450$@gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:39:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2qe_pJ5EMS+sf1CB7Hi4kbvDWoJ9x8-kgurcdY5j1nVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: bess@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd020e059e322b48"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/WyCMLSrXIklm03SCvoMFGmEzcrQ>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 05:40:06 -0000

I support.  I think this is a very important feature that provides
flexibility to operators In upgrading edge bandwidth.  Sorry to chime in
late after the poll closed.

Since this draft is an introduction of a new feature to support EVPN
unequal load balancing,  have any vendors implemented this feature yet.

Also have any vendors see any issues with the evpn unequal cost lb solution
depiction in the draft.  I don’t know of any operators that have
implemented.

Kind regards

Gyan

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 8:54 AM <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> This poll is now closed without any objection to progress.
>
> However (expect if I have missed it), I haven’t heard about any
> implementation.
>
>
>
> Is there any known implementation ? If NO, is the WG against progressing
> the document without an implementation ?
>
>
>
> Feedback required by the end of the week.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
>
> *Sent:* vendredi 17 janvier 2020 09:56
> *To:* bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org
> *Cc:* bess-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
>
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
> [2]
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also,
> please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track
> RFC.
>
>
>
> This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
> all the Authors and Contributors.
>
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
>
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please
> indicate if you are aware of any implementations.
>
>  Thank you,
>
> Stephane
>
>
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
-- 

Gyan  Mishra

Network Engineering & Technology

Verizon

Silver Spring, MD 20904

Phone: 301 502-1347

Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com