IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 17 January 2020 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C05D120098; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 06:19:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=AFm9OZWC; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=XU2CfiKi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZCCWG7QaRhN; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 06:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C50120074; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 06:19:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14041; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1579270740; x=1580480340; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Yc6bd933CIxQDo9AV+4GrIgMS3IE8/q2d9SLMQ93Bew=; b=AFm9OZWCKwTulOELcPzseQpNBD++sGR5qVF+Pn1+nkR0S040BAiIjw4g bNUznH7hksgQYMzJ6GvddhZcq8lbnCRsFd6MTun/iNgrcvtMQ0MW8/pUz 3GC3lZd4BzW5RFQlGpItD5pTZ7ebVBmcZ8Y46kI4Ei1Xg9uvPlPbJsA+H k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:BV/PshAQAlVr9YzvTq4oUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qgw3kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMdRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXETwIfPCZC0hF8MEX1hgrDm2
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BoAgAQwSFe/40NJK1lGwEBAQEBAQEFAQEBEQEBAwMBAQGBe4ElLyQsBWxYIAQLKoQRg0YDiniCX4lgiUyEYoFCgRADVAkBAQEMAQEjCgIBAYRAAheBcyQ4EwIDDQEBBAEBAQIBBQRthTcMhV4BAQEBAxIRHQEBNwEPAgEIEQMBAisCAgIfER0IAQEEAQ0FIoMEAYF9TQMuAQ6gfwKBOYhhdYEygn8BAQWBLwETQYJ+DQuCDAMGgTaMHBqCAIERJyCCTD6CG0kCAwGBLAESATYJDYJjMoIsjUyDB4VcmF1ECoI5hz2KS4QoG4JHiAaOP4FmjW0LZIhhgiGQAwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSJncXAVOyoBgkFQGA2IATiDO4UUhT90gSmJYYIyAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,330,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="428160049"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 Jan 2020 14:18:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00HEIxV0006155 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:18:59 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:18:59 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:18:57 -0500
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:18:57 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JuHLZ1nA62iUKzX/wQQqb9V0gKpYNnGKlrDflDp1Dz9l13yaXtbS3qEmOt5Dy+1/zdzbooqwMhopbjcUuQMhCGu7Jme3K+IK37GVul5nVGizsqmaZcHb9buPoo0EKSP4SlgGQbDFyiEp2rGShJl50J6v3QBh+qkQ0xnhKQkbxXRv1qS/9bVFYHmu8RQgGecomEO7s+RCwwmm2ttsXFI9JdcuIWT/X9/oU+NvP8qA1FstWFBqf11Shf4K0onkst1bACYA+pL0dMdqAe5C5GqCifyqDmcfjg9TTQKekniOhHvyhQMrKLXU5I/C/984L+DX75V6ZW33cCgMFyfRrQ78gg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Yc6bd933CIxQDo9AV+4GrIgMS3IE8/q2d9SLMQ93Bew=; b=XHInWmaQYj5sQFAzP83RaigQaUOTcJcZxzb87jTfURfi4tj75kY3vqQ2HsATmlgBwG3kD5Rsv/LU+uACCHFoFN73qm+/CV/4hf5wNI0CIQcbMF8iydAab+KYAhunlHPpxXtywX2HkltOshv6T2qnA5KBX/p3KZEJXyuctID6JNNc0b73ce5WG8QGcBEptbUZYpbjJ+txN572xx4U9SR+WVQ/VaWNBzW8B+hrAozGGNMI2aGJVcq9bra93AgAYWlb8TOWna8mnMa+bLG+ugpnkO735QydI9CxPzpnUjm0BMkeefpgCbK6pbwPp0f2ftK91VSmil5hQ4OFBY9x7vrkYA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Yc6bd933CIxQDo9AV+4GrIgMS3IE8/q2d9SLMQ93Bew=; b=XU2CfiKiOek05mzfNfqpL14yESq6WioOd91blmXmgLX98xtXUDdn5AZyLWM7OekLJeNikVfj6/ChT1kernMZxpkctVsIAMqKJf3H+Z4lQmriamqFEmy1Y8rtUW0xT77jhx00/z9B4VY7MOvGtlH5/W17QbgWxBT2D6ZH5eoHUnY=
Received: from MWHPR11MB1245.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.169.236.11) by MWHPR11MB1503.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.55.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.23; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:18:56 +0000
Received: from MWHPR11MB1245.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6923:67ba:4956:7d40]) by MWHPR11MB1245.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6923:67ba:4956:7d40%12]) with mapi id 15.20.2644.015; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:18:56 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com" <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org>
CC: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
Thread-Index: AdXNE94EszMGlSm0RRilR2ZdY+C/dAAA0Q8A
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:18:56 +0000
Message-ID: <17FB5118-DC7F-4EEC-A693-BBC3B71E9554@cisco.com>
References: <013601d5cd13$fceb7620$f6c26260$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <013601d5cd13$fceb7620$f6c26260$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1004::22a]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 90566347-50a6-40f9-c45b-08d79b58302c
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB1503:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR11MB15038426470AFA13A881FCBDC2310@MWHPR11MB1503.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0285201563
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(6486002)(36756003)(6512007)(186003)(6506007)(53546011)(2616005)(5660300002)(2906002)(81166006)(81156014)(8676002)(8936002)(110136005)(316002)(66446008)(478600001)(966005)(64756008)(66556008)(86362001)(4326008)(76116006)(91956017)(71200400001)(33656002)(66476007)(66946007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR11MB1503; H:MWHPR11MB1245.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: R2uLLxVoY5hiq4Fe3pdXDoPdU3MGxJQyhKqh6Eht4bdLBQf1so8+UHU+7yHgUG8Lp6OG1lm6f5Y0LoRn04a/6SxRNBllPZtrnoDTwJ+bAkJ/n87ctr2q8z5AfI5C3ZraEz1mR6FVifUaBL5fS8TXeRZ+zHWjyarriJTYtRSXXPIPFWBzkU4OInfRMirBatMn4W0CqS0IdsylVqA4tNQ3JdLYDmIr5eeVzeQAYQbrmWOF060BSOX/O6PNtH3zCrpxbpK4z9yn7MOw4wrqs2ChvvPK4y6oiWGYL8+uwfsqj/imdbuIcqhOGsQ01fhH9MHHD+vkW0h+WjjFqbZ4sHYd3CWPLJxS5BKbWoNjtU+h0TcYKSn3yKvMgZXJPYhw1ZSckqJAuf91VfBnzz7Y5C/34LVE+cikGtZSxej83IuqIyaYoYFtRzH7C+qppa6v1lsADv5vN7u++DE1GbYrNzjAWFc133SPtmr1PwpcPYcsIbk=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_17FB5118DC7F4EECA693BBC3B71E9554ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 90566347-50a6-40f9-c45b-08d79b58302c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Jan 2020 14:18:56.2352 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Il/VUqBikjsOnUfc8KTEO3wk8meGOvellzR1IXjWjlyQZd94NSdx96dEM/J+yKXE
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB1503
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.18, xch-aln-008.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/Wl1e3xnMNkZEOD-dYOyz1uqQZmQ>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:19:03 -0000

Hi Stephane, BESS WG,
I support publication as a proposed standard. The mechanisms require capability advertisement and these must be standardized.
Thanks,
Acee

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com" <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 3:56 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org>
Cc: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]

Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate if you are aware of any implementations.

 Thank you,

Stephane

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email