Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

I decided to look at the draft and will send my mostly editorial comments
in a day or so.  Sorry for the delay.

But what I find really surprising is that the draft made it through WGLC
without IANA considerations or security considerations sections.  I thought
those were mandatory.  I haven't been to an IETF meeting in a while.  Has
something changed?

Anoop

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:54 AM <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> This poll is now closed without any objection to progress.
>
> However (expect if I have missed it), I haven’t heard about any
> implementation.
>
>
>
> Is there any known implementation ? If NO, is the WG against progressing
> the document without an implementation ?
>
>
>
> Feedback required by the end of the week.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* vendredi 17 janvier 2020 09:56
> *To:* bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.authors@ietf.org
> *Cc:* bess-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
>
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03
> [2]
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also,
> please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track
> RFC.
>
>
>
> This poll runs until Fri 31th January 2019.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from
> all the Authors and Contributors.
>
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
>
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please
> indicate if you are aware of any implementations.
>
>  Thank you,
>
> Stephane
>
>
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>