Re: [bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 29 September 2015 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8821B49DB; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RUV8-EZNDO0u; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A927B1B49DA; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [112.198.78.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1048A1801487; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:23:12 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13A404)
In-Reply-To: <27B7F911-6629-48F6-92F0-618E6B92F356@cooperw.in>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:23:03 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <26106733-2FD2-4A8A-8449-111D1BABC599@pi.nu>
References: <20150928161520.26696.69027.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <560A64B9.1000709@alcatel-lucent.com> <560A6CBF.7040705@pi.nu> <27B7F911-6629-48F6-92F0-618E6B92F356@cooperw.in>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/7JK4EyTd-et3e-2FapwbW2NHXys>
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, bess-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:23:16 -0000

Alissa,

Sent from my iPad

> On 29 Sep 2015, at 20:59, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
> Hi Loa,
> 
>> 
>> The operational mode of most working groups are to make the existence of
>> an IPR disclosure know to the working group in working group adoption polls, working group last calls and in other postings . WG members can
>> then check the disclosure.
> 
> Yep, I was wondering if the above happened. Martin confirmed that it did not.

Not entirely true, I checked the IPR disclosure. Found that it was acceptable and
Found no reason (according to how we handled these things up to now) to say
anything on the list. 

If we want to make a change in practice, we should at least find something that
works as well as "silence is consent".  A few mails, resulting from a normal IPR
disclosure, does not improve anything.

/Loa
> 
> Alissa
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 2015-09-29 18:15, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
>>> Hello Alissa,
>>> 
>>> thank you.
>>> Regarding your comment, I searched a bit in the archives.
>>> The IPR disclosure (05/2013) announcement has apparently only been sent
>>> to ipr-announce. I hasn't been sent to the L2VPN list.
>>> The Chairs of the L2VPN WG did poll the list for any undisclosed IPR at
>>> the time of the WG LC (10/2014).
>>> But in short I could not find any specific discussion on the disclosure
>>> within L2VPN (and there has not been any in BESS which inherited of the
>>> doc post WGLC).
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Martin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 28/09/2015 18:15, Alissa Cooper a écrit :
>>>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>>>> draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: No Objection
>>>> 
>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> COMMENT:
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> Was there WG discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/ and
>>>> whether to proceed? The shepherd write-up doesn't say.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BESS mailing list
>>> BESS@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess