IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 29 September 2015 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAFC1B3CAD for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3RtRLU47PO04 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45EE41B3CB1 for <bess@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370932081D for <bess@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:01:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:01:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=U4L0CSd+wyhU+QM/VNzvQONxsOA=; b=VInuSN 0FVIpbRkgR6zEceMVd+78S57GhuP/S9ftMAbIP6QGlfoi2l3oLZ2nTdx0kwjcg3G iqMj96exUd7BQ2aUeScme0xItvije1P7gWjVLCUY23sOlGLaK8aNDC/joxV9qYCy xyTBWUmEC5Y1W4Q6rr0aQRRNQv0Lc5vbzY9QU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=U4L0CSd+wyhU+QM /VNzvQONxsOA=; b=gDwkp/horXhl57RWJlH46NjlKM/4H3X5Z3jzS/b4Xl9yTvp vJj3xMGcSR0ATiUIQNKmXnRdq7MTeaf8e3fkn9dKN+U/kiXzRravPupyvCIZijW6 LRxvdWxHCY45yMZ5DznNKG5ApyMULDkf02Id2gAp4Txt5eTRjV8K6ETguMOQ=
X-Sasl-enc: me4KJXw10WJcGvpRHk1zzGQp4grsjsEG/J/9tjgKJgeM 1443531682
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8814.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.181]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 501BAC0001D; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:01:22 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <560A6CBF.7040705@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:59:47 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <27B7F911-6629-48F6-92F0-618E6B92F356@cooperw.in>
References: <20150928161520.26696.69027.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <560A64B9.1000709@alcatel-lucent.com> <560A6CBF.7040705@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/Xsv22iiL1Vgj3iINx_EvebX_ckM>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>, bess@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:09:46 -0000

Hi Loa,

> 
> The operational mode of most working groups are to make the existence of
> an IPR disclosure know to the working group in working group adoption polls, working group last calls and in other postings . WG members can
> then check the disclosure.

Yep, I was wondering if the above happened. Martin confirmed that it did not.

Alissa

> 
> 
> On 2015-09-29 18:15, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
>> Hello Alissa,
>> 
>> thank you.
>> Regarding your comment, I searched a bit in the archives.
>> The IPR disclosure (05/2013) announcement has apparently only been sent
>> to ipr-announce. I hasn't been sent to the L2VPN list.
>> The Chairs of the L2VPN WG did poll the list for any undisclosed IPR at
>> the time of the WG LC (10/2014).
>> But in short I could not find any specific discussion on the disclosure
>> within L2VPN (and there has not been any in BESS which inherited of the
>> doc post WGLC).
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>> 
>> 
>> Le 28/09/2015 18:15, Alissa Cooper a écrit :
>>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: No Objection
>>> 
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Was there WG discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/ and
>>> whether to proceed? The shepherd write-up doesn't say.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> BESS mailing list
>> BESS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email