Re: [bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)

Hi Martin,

Yes, indeed, https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/

Cheers,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 8:10 AM
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>,
"bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on
draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)

>Just for information, the authors (3 out of 4) have answered that they
>were not aware of any *undisclosed* IPR, which somehow implies that some
>had already been disclosed.
>
>-m
>
>Le 29/09/2015 14:59, Alissa Cooper a écrit :
>> Hi Loa,
>>
>>>
>>> The operational mode of most working groups are to make the existence
>>>of
>>> an IPR disclosure know to the working group in working group adoption
>>>polls, working group last calls and in other postings . WG members can
>>> then check the disclosure.
>>
>> Yep, I was wondering if the above happened. Martin confirmed that it
>>did not.
>>
>> Alissa
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2015-09-29 18:15, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
>>>> Hello Alissa,
>>>>
>>>> thank you.
>>>> Regarding your comment, I searched a bit in the archives.
>>>> The IPR disclosure (05/2013) announcement has apparently only been
>>>>sent
>>>> to ipr-announce. I hasn't been sent to the L2VPN list.
>>>> The Chairs of the L2VPN WG did poll the list for any undisclosed IPR
>>>>at
>>>> the time of the WG LC (10/2014).
>>>> But in short I could not find any specific discussion on the
>>>>disclosure
>>>> within L2VPN (and there has not been any in BESS which inherited of
>>>>the
>>>> doc post WGLC).
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 28/09/2015 18:15, Alissa Cooper a écrit :
>>>>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>>>>> draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: No Objection
>>>>>
>>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>>>>>this
>>>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please refer to
>>>>>https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> COMMENT:
>>>>> 
>>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Was there WG discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/ and
>>>>> whether to proceed? The shepherd write-up doesn't say.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BESS mailing list
>>>> BESS@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess