Re: [bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Vigoureux <[e-mail]>]

Dave,

I can't tell but what surprised me is that the disclosure announcement 
was not automatically sent to L2VPN.
Usually the distribution list (TO & CC) is quite wide, but it was not 
the case for that draft.

-m

Le 29/09/2015 15:35, David Allan I a écrit :
> For my reference (and ensuring if this comes up again we get it right), what part broke down here?
>
> I made sure we filed the disclosure, is it also my job to make sure it is announced on the appropriate WG lists?
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 3:15 AM
> To: Alissa Cooper; The IESG
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT)
>
> Hello Alissa,
>
> thank you.
> Regarding your comment, I searched a bit in the archives.
> The IPR disclosure (05/2013) announcement has apparently only been sent to ipr-announce. I hasn't been sent to the L2VPN list.
> The Chairs of the L2VPN WG did poll the list for any undisclosed IPR at the time of the WG LC (10/2014).
> But in short I could not find any specific discussion on the disclosure within L2VPN (and there has not been any in BESS which inherited of the doc post WGLC).
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
> Le 28/09/2015 18:15, Alissa Cooper a écrit :
>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>> this introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to
>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Was there WG discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/ and
>> whether to proceed? The shepherd write-up doesn't say.
>>
>>
>>