IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

"Lijo Thomas" <lijo@cdac.in> Tue, 18 May 2021 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lijo@cdac.in>
X-Original-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61E2F407A2; Mon, 17 May 2021 23:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=0.01, HTML_MESSAGE=0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdac.in
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YcIO_VP07wq9; Mon, 17 May 2021 23:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailsender.cdac.in (mailsender.cdac.in [196.1.113.117]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D291FF40789; Mon, 17 May 2021 23:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ims.pune.cdac.in (ims.pune.cdac.in [10.208.1.15]) by mailsender.cdac.in (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 14I6ndpg024777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 May 2021 12:19:39 +0530
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cdac.in; s=default; t=1621320580; bh=Riuy6Sv0SXw6XjzAS+IaO0Sq2C9UPn3Olz/TQwLOQgM=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=PSKSuG55xicpSEv0HEhd/udtfFNf9tCaZ3gpllj9Cg6GV88ek4Gv/J6Tja7MmFOXn Y822xXui+I7tnCRbKk53bgzzMzjqGRT484ID+KYWvpcjTsGvW9MrmYMv2jJfnr+z/C jBkzATipKXM528bOb/IQwpMy4eAWOWhT+UcxQgfs=
Received: from mailgw.pune.cdac.in ([10.208.1.4]) by ims.pune.cdac.in (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 14I6nSk5002961; Tue, 18 May 2021 12:19:29 +0530
X-AuthUser: lijo
Received: from ciglijo (lijo_new_pc.tvm.cdac.in [10.176.10.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailgw.pune.cdac.in (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 14I6nRrN009862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 May 2021 12:19:28 +0530
From: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>
To: 'Erik Kline' <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, 'Jean Mahoney' <jmahoney@amsl.com>
Cc: 'Charlie Perkins' <charliep@computer.org>, 'RFC Errata System' <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, satishnaidu80@gmail.com, "'S.V.R.Anand'" <anandsvr@iisc.ac.in>, 'Malati Hegde' <malati@iisc.ac.in>, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, 6lo-ads@ietf.org, c310@rfc-editor.org, shwetha.bhandari@gmail.com
References: <20210513181917.B37DEF4074D@rfc-editor.org> <005001d74b19$62bcb980$28362c80$@cdac.in> <c3ecb73f-dea6-330f-5c67-2baa39cac6d2@amsl.com> <b92c3841-2ad1-533d-6f7c-18265fa071c3@computer.org> <bc14c994-1962-1d12-4587-2de37e07fb42@amsl.com> <CAMGpriXrE1B6Cg6U8pY7CJ5mHoxpAhjpVXzRttZxm+GPwLmA4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriVPVLAS9FfwiqES3-o=NB4bjQC3wgozj40BZ5OS8Q22mQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriUeN56VQqFFv2VqP=BGS0_+LKN5gWZCsW6NaBoVm52sCw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMGpriUeN56VQqFFv2VqP=BGS0_+LKN5gWZCsW6NaBoVm52sCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:19:50 +0530
Message-ID: <001e01d74bb2$00419980$00c4cc80$@cdac.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01D74BE0.19F9D580"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQLWjMeqzesFQLbVnUjau6Dgu0+4igHzgdg9AdArX1cA9EwOJwI1KZrIArD449ICZ9G2IANT3CqPqG96wnA=
Content-Language: en-in
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-ID: 14I6nSk5002961
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-MCPCheck-IMS:
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.601, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_50 0.80, BOGUS_THREAD 0.50, HTML_MESSAGE 0.30, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00), not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.539, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_20 -0.74, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00)
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-Information: Please contact npsfhelp@cdac.in/mailadmin@cdac.in for more information
X-MailScanner-ID: 14I6ndpg024777
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-From: lijo@cdac.in
X-CDAC-MailScanner-Spam-Status: No
Subject: Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c310@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c310.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c310/>
List-Post: <mailto:c310@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 06:50:08 -0000

Yes Erik, you are correct, we observe some discrepancy . We are currently merging the things properly. Somehow we missed that communications and it was very important to integrate those corrections.

 

Thanks and special mention for you to pointing out that.

 

@ Jean – Kindly hold the further proceedings until we get back.

 

  Thanks & Regards,

  Lijo Thomas 

 

From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> 
Sent: 18 May 2021 12:11
To: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
Cc: Charlie Perkins <charliep@computer.org>; Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>; RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; satishnaidu80@gmail.com; S.V.R.Anand <anandsvr@iisc.ac.in>; Malati Hegde <malati@iisc.ac.in>; 6lo-chairs@ietf.org; 6lo-ads@ietf.org; c310@rfc-editor.org; shwetha.bhandari@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

 

Specifically, I'm wondering if we can give quick consideration to the topics here before final publication:

 

    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/MPf1zwq5KtY_tBspdH0JEW0yHPs/

 

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:04 PM Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:ek.ietf@gmail.com> > wrote:

Actually, can I put things on pause until inclusion of some modular arithmetic fixes are merged (if they haven't been already)?

 

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:01 PM Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:ek.ietf@gmail.com> > wrote:

I've had a look over https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-diff.html and everything LGTM.

 

Thanks,

-ek


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ]

This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email