Re: [Cbor] Remove .cbordet? (was Re: đź”” WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control)

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Sat, 23 March 2024 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74204C14CEFD; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9QTWWseDsBbU; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa36.google.com (mail-vk1-xa36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7406C14F73E; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa36.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4d870fb9f5cso745594e0c.3; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711237016; x=1711841816; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gamT0qT4kr5ARzXicGZeU5XTpHy1983Og0XWBzNvBOo=; b=ZupSD/4LnhmxxGa9Rhq52bKqcY6KS8Y+bLEvjfSJFLzfslY2pSTYjp9zJcvu1Iqls4 ib7eNBOdD7jETVIlWvmJ/qKnO6NBn20tGkPHcHDMfkqWPTEn/V0uKPshke6RVJKALO2W Jud0soKQuAsWtump2s8ifHME/JOAfviqJx/dLTzSh0jBJNlR4yfBH+4uOLKSOJu+nScr 0zIskeAC9nxOFxqEILqgPbWtJEMxekKKRXhXAPYD/3lUA39ksuW+7bWjqPVsdBPVX+Ni C/MBJanQxfupQ0zhKFuUumYx1fvy/QKh93BTI59kkIHLbQEUmGru98OYP8rZhMTClXpU Q/Og==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711237016; x=1711841816; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=gamT0qT4kr5ARzXicGZeU5XTpHy1983Og0XWBzNvBOo=; b=SyOzftdNLKwO/WpDxt83QPjfhNjBhNHoLEXyDjJ9HIdfYqahR47594QKtPoErwl57W FkaOeryVDD6pQRfpLYO75ll7x33Lr+hRHrlMJmPY2l0n1a6Uz/1oJDsUq3KEjicuFf0P NQkZWn0gUYQzLgy/NDcNMZfMB60Gs5bURlUhgBZXwzWv4RXr2AkA4uQJFZNRM6DBO0uH 2y8bUo8gb+D634tYncsXZX4trXGjbI2wgJF8kts5ymhJx83NHeLgNGqi4LHW0yy0qu9+ GAq8e3T7b4Emi+c7501TGpgd7N3UGlZXe0av2nn8jETP5gBXYhPlySZ0TWlasZS9qgGK iZMw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUIL1JFxVlcflQX7+zEk7h63GIFE3KmpMtULxPMu8O/ITAracq189S9sftwbolaq3IbMHdPmaAmApH9zGJoxlqpoj2ySoF5vAfoQXIaqDxTWs+rZvjnTD1+YaUQwZHcTaFCMuckKWx+3Sk=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwuaRhM+PVpMiR6+mkCOmj/xur7iqgiNDg+IW3SGmkNl6bmUvcO 6cModwoe//53iG+xjqDhib/fYcPkSSSZhRhCw0YQm67eBgSohhGE74UL5/CZOlKHLecBHeO0BRl ivCl6PuYYmffDoC+XR5WTdWUTrtqUwQNZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHaKpvKyARl6fPBJpFRMitVdI7Q81/sjueYiDUbEyFondvZGSGkmG3xAfffsIvjEHfZrKA6+pQ75MnKEuQ6gnc=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:7dce:0:b0:4d8:74a2:6d35 with SMTP id y197-20020a1f7dce000000b004d874a26d35mr2327158vkc.9.1711237015634; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ZeMG7tpfKLyf3aSz@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <9558918F-009A-49B2-82C1-D761B2D7D831@island-resort.com> <Zf9kh419AupOTX4A@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
In-Reply-To: <Zf9kh419AupOTX4A@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 19:36:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN40gSumFk0nEKAkD-D855w44_+qCva+0AsQdPiu20EJSj_CiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian AmsĂĽss <christian@amsuess.com>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Cc: "lgl island-resort.com" <lgl@island-resort.com>, "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000718bb306145c6abf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/AkelrRzrq8dZgGqQEPe3saOxtRk>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Remove .cbordet? (was Re: đź”” WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:37:00 -0000

Hi,

I strongly agree with Laurence.  We should publish More Controls without
.cbordet and instead only
publish CDE with the .cde control operator.

Cheers,
- Ira

*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*

*Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
*Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*

*Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*








*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
<blueroofmusic@gmail.com>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*


On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 7:24 PM Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
wrote:

> Hello Carsten, Laurence,
>
> (writing here not as a chair)
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 08:23:36PM +0000, lgl island-resort.com wrote:
> > I’d like to suggest that we not define “.cbordet” in this document,
> > that section 4 be removed.  We want to move past the definition of CDE
> > in RFC 8949 to the new one in the new document. Let the one-and-only
> > control operator for determinism be “.cde” in draft-ietf-cbor-cde.
>
> I agree that having an operator for deterministically encoded CBOR while
> CDE is being specified will rather contribute to confusion. I'd expect
> that like EDN has become the one known diagnostic notation, CDE will
> become the one "deterministic" encoding understood if someone doesn't
> specify their own rules.
>
> While I would not object to publishing more-control with .cbordet in it,
> I have a weak preference for publishing it without.
>
> BR
> Christian
>
> --
> To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater
> powers.
>   -- Bene Gesserit axiom
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
>