IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Reviews and shepherd for draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control

Alexander Stein <ajstein.standards@gmail.com> Fri, 19 April 2024 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ajstein.standards@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BE3C14F6F7; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ar0JdYcvV5Ad; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com (mail-io1-xd44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66BCC14F6F5; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7da42caa377so52750939f.3; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713538616; x=1714143416; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jUCUAf/g452eh6rTmGQl52wCn5dDMfdTasD0iYkvrJY=; b=ZWwZ9RmHSgrVxH1m0sCaacPDE0CSxRptCGKmbPwjlblK8LnNoctbylMe5TwXoSfmUL u98EbmeHbuUleh/RR7RQHRvtvOTRF63Yzg64hWP9h6ndMh9XwJhpQpUbkahWwkk+ntJu cv268Em8R75C4cJ82is8KEdwweA/JhdIr2LpJyUGGMBtxbwrlk68cgs98O1SF3cgYV49 fIGDPK/VeOYNWIDUO5lKzBRHKaTiUddZo1LLE7bM8ogMQ43w3fyN/HOeuguxSeXXdS2f 51ZlMoovebIIl49TQy8xqGyKQiJMDl78LrfBQ8ChbdP8b4c3AlvimrU6hqFxcNX9G1RC x64Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713538616; x=1714143416; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jUCUAf/g452eh6rTmGQl52wCn5dDMfdTasD0iYkvrJY=; b=cAGAzWq2W+IEoyGgVC12LWzgUqWT0cetToie0SsdkKsxvwJ8kn8OyRRUT+0HHjBzvk W7yBAHhlw16xu7czcDlKH4i2G45C2bOChGkc25hEEaT126103YvwevnsgAcBBzDkJJx4 HvdqjAkeK2cqGlScW3jBUhh//J38p2ydv6znVol1koK8wwWXQ7bj6dXqovbBio5r+0U/ TjwNDtRkcuBUQYUDA4N9dv1nLBlColvfxU1CeDUQYA2PQwqyeT49H/BnHQeeo9kTCXcN JjyNhXDcE9CPz5Pqslo4WgJu0rvlAfJUfMMybTRPZfhOYlziNfy0VK8HY4aKnj6CC7VE pYoQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVVE5oPEJDCiP/NP/P5s1iukphtUHuaiudDLr9cOzSfRvtCx+OcSK69mImdVQg3XxPrYrjpmmuOTQq80aqaZFFFYSKKdq67ceDRQBsmogxFYayaXkXuZGztxMI=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzA8WwG6Tc85DxCWgOD6rSAcHSElX0Crx344x1H2mqIskf0R7+G 2DKIMY0rYtzrawlamkDyHLWcPUEW1A+a/M6o6M5Ejg/pdjX9TuVenxDVI7TT0IYLZITmUtM1rs+ /g0xmUpKYwnXmDwLOJnMdgjxqzso=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGv+1Sw7v5gpteQVUbr2hRy+Tz5E3B96cT63IlujZDQk9FDq5H8Yl70wQG+38pz0pWpG1GCZaXycWWtqYJ3rkE=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:dc0e:0:b0:7da:303c:b056 with SMTP id s14-20020a6bdc0e000000b007da303cb056mr2760547ioc.10.1713538615974; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ZeMG7tpfKLyf3aSz@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <ZhPIC9DyzcpyhjPI@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <CAMvBLPKNe5QGOb5Yww11cHzFoMuTuxsHUCrDQ9b1jL+WYWO0MQ@mail.gmail.com> <Zh_i4yKkCtks8aXy@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
In-Reply-To: <Zh_i4yKkCtks8aXy@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
From: Alexander Stein <ajstein.standards@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:56:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMvBLPJ6Ai4K=MkxudnYXTEeFbYFSnTPBdghE738kFaqreK-BA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
Cc: cbor@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000083a4e00616744cfd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/rgg1xV-v5ZQ-BJ5KJk6aN5KNPeM>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Reviews and shepherd for draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:56:57 -0000

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:55 AM Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
wrote:

> The minute takers didn't catch that in full. Looking at the recording,
> you mentioned the topic of which syntax operators of printf are
> supported; the specification explicitly excludes the length modifiers
> (hh, h, l, ll etc) as well as pointers (p) and number of written bytes
> (n). The other comments noted from you related to the include/import
> mechanisms. Did I miss something?
>

 You did not. I finally reviewed the current draft and related specs, so I
can say my concerns about this detail are assuaged. Sorry about that. My
other concerns discussed during 119 are about another I-D (cddl-modules),
and I had messed up conflating that here. So I will follow up on that in a
separate thread, GitHub issue, and/or PRs.

I will follow up on that off-list.
>

Sounds good and will discuss with you off-list. Just wanted to give a
status update and apologize for the above.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email