IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Remove .cbordet? (was Re: đź”” WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control)

Alexander Stein <ajstein.standards@gmail.com> Sat, 23 March 2024 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ajstein.standards@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCC7C14F6AB; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dEb5WFprvzEO; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf41.google.com (mail-qv1-xf41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7E88C14F6A9; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf41.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6967e656fdeso1193366d6.0; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711238315; x=1711843115; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3cHBXfhKfZZCNlrN+2OJ2bElK1vlIQTQtPXfiEHcMDo=; b=anI+Nt87NFDNJlLrILXi/NQGjpNvk+2N5MZNK49rs1HvZkGon5U9EGmLd0H0R7u9Z/ Rz4fR7KhaBvwPqW+rkcAhaXwLlfd1gjCwzRJkR96Fa0A1pk2h/cnRfJi0v8SELN/L2Ng YQDFt0sSzHIjmeXqd1BAas749aM/Lqlk50Zytiq/0mE6y1yXFU5IzJVsID+3y7sfIOmD NVNCg4T4QCgc7r2fBOHKiYmjgXwMU6B6T6CHDAId5X0kBKiOCXtga8R+TCxN2ObE2Ian jiPep0zGFQtl9GC/CXpYQFxLxXH8tjiR+dPHzoFzYBwSgCnsS64r+abnpIQcPtlzWR8+ S2hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711238315; x=1711843115; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3cHBXfhKfZZCNlrN+2OJ2bElK1vlIQTQtPXfiEHcMDo=; b=YABFfk2D0HYwV4WmLWlTogmaRBJjSIbRbTl9pnr1d/GMbRDTkTiWWGigQtHvlfTNv3 1n2IU8bWji/VAGTGBrK0V+sjxQjDA3qgjFRcdL0yYOn8dakOnSMaNY5y68LGeJym7e9Z 6DWjSlxw6WuY694KVCoDgNXWTamqdvcZtfnARTMbmlXs9+BSFSu+y0EbuKdFDMOgKEmF FA0GZjMkqK1ihhFJjVzlgB3eQPTqkiDVIQ3nuZCrPk7/Ogj95Yp9p5g+moB4HaTJMhPs /MZ1y7pzPb7rXDmtXFAY2ou+fz+ucimIF7V/P3r5YitLgiQAdOV20fcUSxQzQL7wc9yX FFXQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUxTqYX9ADK3FU9LFk1xRsP5ot+4GTC8ZV9gGaC8NXHX0Jh6WlVNm8r0L6cD2CaguFPMGx2vgamwlHQxIp6EVgauAhUt+jEoUKNid2ADkWrFhijNLVo10F/iN0=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzPVauoOqCPnFICw6V89kE69PtnReH1B7xDZLUgCOIt51dGlVPK Kw4BXMGaM2TiUXhlBz7eOxXRDuRRbJ6PisoKJ35DxFS/XTy3ZfgdxMCXFN6azY4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG2phvdlqclzvu3zMX3isTgE0HcYyzD2MpyBpUPWJvbjSyFmqHcLiIx4+UbVd+bR4jYpEjwJg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:c4c:b0:691:837c:a140 with SMTP id r12-20020a0562140c4c00b00691837ca140mr3593995qvj.64.1711238315289; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.67.58.14] ([185.156.46.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ke30-20020a056214301e00b006967be0dc85sm936673qvb.79.2024.03.23.16.58.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3ad3ef86-d0ba-4c61-a6f2-b5290e7e969c@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 19:58:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: "lgl island-resort.com" <lgl@island-resort.com>, Christian AmsĂĽss <christian@amsuess.com>
Cc: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control@ietf.org>
References: <ZeMG7tpfKLyf3aSz@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <9558918F-009A-49B2-82C1-D761B2D7D831@island-resort.com>
From: Alexander Stein <ajstein.standards@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9558918F-009A-49B2-82C1-D761B2D7D831@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/C_yYLkVaryFytAjEuaJ4gE9WCHA>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Remove .cbordet? (was Re: đź”” WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:58:40 -0000

I too support the removal of .cbordet form 
draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control.

Regards,
A.J.

On 3/23/24 16:23, lgl island-resort.com wrote:
> draft-ietf-cbor-cde is in the works and will provide a clear standard definition for CBOR deterministic encoding (CDE). It defines the control operator “.cde”.
>
> This document defines “.cbordet” which references CDE as defined in RFC 8949.
>
> I’d like to suggest that we not define “.cbordet” in this document, that section 4 be removed.  We want to move past the definition of CDE in RFC 8949 to the new one in the new document. Let the one-and-only control operator for determinism be “.cde” in draft-ietf-cbor-cde.
>
> LL
>
>
>> On Mar 2, 2024, at 4:01 AM, Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> wrote:
>>
>> tl;dr: please review.
>>
>> Hello CBOR group,
>>
>> the time box we have set in interim meetings for more control operators
>> has expired, and all the input so far has been processed into -03, which
>> has been deemed ready by the author. The reference implementation
>> understands the newly introduced operators.
>>
>> * Data tracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control/
>> * HTML version: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-03.html
>>
>> Please review the document, and provide your comments and assessment of
>> readiness on the list. This working group last call is open until
>> 2024-03-15.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Christian
>> _______________________________________________
>> CBOR mailing list
>> CBOR@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email