[CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

Hi, Lou and all, 

 1: Yes; i think this document fill the gap with current relevant RFCs/WGs we have;
 2: Contributing text as author;
 3: yes/support;

Regards,
Xian

________________________________________
发件人: CCAMP [ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger [lberger@labn.net]
发送时间: 2014年10月30日 3:38
收件人: CCAMP
主题: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

All,

This is start of a three week poll on making
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group
document.  The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting.

This is a bit of an atypical adoption call.  We, the chairs, think this
document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes
should be directed by the WG.  Recall that the individual authors have
already merged this document with
draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp.  Our questions to the WG are:

1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document
   explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE
   RFCs/mechanisms?

   Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish.

2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how?

   Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or
   something else.

3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document
   as the basis for the topic?

   Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

   If indicating no, please state your objections to the document,
   keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it
   works its way through wg process.  Either way, also please feel
   free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption.

   Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1.

The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th.

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp