Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

Paweł Brzozowski <PBrzozowski@advaoptical.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 12:01 UTC

Return-Path: <PBrzozowski@advaoptical.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA6D1AD0A9 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7IB_ZpAnV-s for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.advaoptical.com (mail.advaoptical.com [91.217.199.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A2B71A0007 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX2.advaoptical.com ([172.20.1.96]) by muc-vsrv-fsmail.advaoptical.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9UC14Lo002234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:01:04 +0100
Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com (172.20.1.95) by MUC-SRV-MBX2.advaoptical.com (172.20.1.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.5; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:01:04 +0100
Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com ([fe80::a129:5e1:23a1:8ba0]) by MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com ([fe80::cddd:2336:31f7:688d%18]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.003; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:01:03 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Brzozowski?= <PBrzozowski@advaoptical.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document
Thread-Index: AQHP86/jRULZdp8EHkW4xsRbnweXh5xIiojg
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:01:03 +0000
Message-ID: <b9af6d5377af4e0581c9572cd26db654@MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com>
References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net>
Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.168.27.50]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.28, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-10-30_05:2014-10-30,2014-10-30,1970-01-01 signatures=0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Edh88olRt2CQ1u0XjRh7dkfoKNI
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:01:09 -0000

All,

1. Yes. I believe that a single reference point for the current best practices will be useful.
2. Yes, as a co-author.
3. Yes/Support.

Regards,
Pawel
-----Original Message-----
From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 3:38 PM
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

All,

This is start of a three week poll on making
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group document.  The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting.

This is a bit of an atypical adoption call.  We, the chairs, think this document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes should be directed by the WG.  Recall that the individual authors have already merged this document with draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp.  Our questions to the WG are:

1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document
   explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE
   RFCs/mechanisms?

   Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish.

2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how?

   Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or
   something else.

3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document
   as the basis for the topic?

   Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

   If indicating no, please state your objections to the document,
   keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it
   works its way through wg process.  Either way, also please feel
   free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption.

   Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1.

The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th.

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp