RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt

Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com> Wed, 05 March 2003 19:54 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 11:54:59 -0800
Message-ID: <4B6D09F3B826D411A67300D0B706EFDEB03D61@nt-exch-yow.pmc-sierra.bc.ca>
From: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
To: 'Scott W Brim' <sbrim@cisco.com>, Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Cc: "'Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com'" <Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET
Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 11:54:34 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

>> > It might be a good idea to require that all IETF protocols support
>> > vendor-specific extensions, so that they could be used by 
>other SDOs
>> > and for experiments.
>> 
>> Ouch... draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt
>
>But that doesn't solve the problem.  There are some protocol
>requirements that can't be met just by extra semantics.
>

Could you please give an example. 

-Shahram