RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt

Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com> Wed, 05 March 2003 22:12 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 14:15:39 -0800
Message-ID: <4B6D09F3B826D411A67300D0B706EFDEB03D65@nt-exch-yow.pmc-sierra.bc.ca>
From: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
To: "'curtis@fictitious.org'" <curtis@fictitious.org>, Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Cc: "'Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com'" <Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET
Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 14:12:59 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Is IESG=Curtis?

-Shahram

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Curtis Villamizar [mailto:curtis@fictitious.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 4:53 PM
>To: Alex Zinin
>Cc: Shahram Davari; 'Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com'; ccamp@ops.ietf.org;
>mpls@UU.NET
>Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt 
>
>
>
>In message <18057706577.20030305113734@psg.com>, Alex Zinin writes:
>> Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 11:12:10 AM, Shahram Davari wrote:
>> [...]
>> > It might be a good idea to require that all IETF protocols support
>> > vendor-specific extensions, so that they could be used by 
>other SDOs
>> > and for experiments.
>> 
>> Ouch... draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt
>> 
>> Alex
>
>
>Looks like the IESG doesn't agree with Shahram on this.
>
>Curtis
>