Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt

Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Wed, 05 March 2003 19:46 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 11:47:21 -0800
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 14:46:48 -0500
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Cc: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>, "'Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com'" <Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Message-ID: <20030305194647.GY2400@sbrim-w2k>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>, Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>, "'Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com'" <Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 11:37:34AM -0800, Alex Zinin allegedly wrote:
> Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 11:12:10 AM, Shahram Davari wrote:
> [...]
> > It might be a good idea to require that all IETF protocols support
> > vendor-specific extensions, so that they could be used by other SDOs
> > and for experiments.
> 
> Ouch... draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt

But that doesn't solve the problem.  There are some protocol
requirements that can't be met just by extra semantics.