RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
"Bardalai, Snigdho" <Snigdho.Bardalai@us.fujitsu.com> Wed, 27 June 2007 23:30 UTC
Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3gxp-00084f-4n for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:30:21 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3gxO-0003Mw-Bt for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:30:21 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1I3gq5-000HGP-Lm for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:22:21 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8
Received: from [168.127.0.56] (helo=fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Snigdho.Bardalai@us.fujitsu.com>) id 1I3gpu-000HEv-Ho for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:22:16 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,468,1175490000"; d="scan'208";a="145786411"
Received: from rchemx01.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.104]) by fncnmp01.fnc.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2007 18:22:08 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7235.2
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:22:07 -0500
Message-ID: <A278CCD6FF152E478C3CF84E4C3BC79D01594C45@rchemx01.fnc.net.local>
In-Reply-To: <008b01c7b67f$4e106e70$c6bea8c0@your029b8cecfe>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
thread-index: Ace2gEsaoUE0+6YkQ9ShuxZEPy9mMQCkWaeQ
From: "Bardalai, Snigdho" <Snigdho.Bardalai@us.fujitsu.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>, ccamp <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>, Arun Satyanarayana <asatyana@cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 31247fb3be228bb596db9127becad0bc
Support this ID as a WG document. Snigdho -----Original Message----- From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 7:41 AM To: Dan Li; ccamp Cc: Deborah A. Brungard; Arun Satyanarayana Subject: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D? Hi, In Prague we found that there was some support for this work, and no opposition. There were questions regarding clarifying that the work does not define new process or procedures, but explains how existing procedures (i.e. draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-08.txt) can be applied in a variety of situations. I think that this revision has included this clarification. There was a request to broaden the draft to cover all scenarios (not just multi-node as before), and this has been done. There was concern about whether there was "service provider" interest in this work. In fact, several of the hands raised to express interest worked for service providers. But I am not personally convinced that this Informational work needs strong support from that sector. More to the point would be support from the vendors who need to agree how they will operate draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext. So, I'd like to ask the WG whether there is support to make this I-D a WG draft. If we do, I would like to see it complete quite quickly. It would need: - review by vendors to make sure it is accurate - a bit more text on security issues Thanks, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Li" <danli@huawei.com> To: "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>; "Farrel, Adrian" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; "Arun Satyanarayana" <asatyana@cisco.com> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:08 AM Subject: New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt > Dear CCAMPers, > > We have published a "new" I-D: > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt > > This I-D replaces the previous I-D > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-multinodes-gr-proc-01.txt. > > According to the discussion in Prague meeting, we have: > 1) Changed draft to be Informational. Mainly rewords the draft to make > sure that it does not give instructions that could be interpreted as > defining the procedures. > 2) The title of the I-D has been changed to "Description of the RSVP-TE > Graceful Restart Procedures", in order to wide the scope of this I-D to > include the single node graceful restart scenario. > > Best regards, > Dan Li
- New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt Dan Li
- Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt … Adrian Farrel
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Lucy Yong
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Young Lee
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Greg Bernstein
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Mach Chen
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Diego Caviglia (GA/ERI)
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Bardalai, Snigdho
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… fabien.verhaeghe
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Zhang Renhai
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Dan Li
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Arun Satyanarayana
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Adrian Farrel