Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 10 August 2007 12:19 UTC
Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJTSd-0004is-K5 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:19:23 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJTSc-00013g-VV for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:19:23 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1IJTH3-0004nK-Ay for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:07:25 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8
Received: from [62.128.201.249] (helo=asmtp2.iomartmail.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <adrian@olddog.co.uk>) id 1IJTGr-0004k0-QS for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:07:19 +0000
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l7AC7BfH015848 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:07:11 +0100
Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l7AC6FNP014362 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:07:09 +0100
Message-ID: <0a0e01c7db46$e5511b40$5002010a@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
References: <003601c7b469$e8a239e0$374d460a@china.huawei.com> <008b01c7b67f$4e106e70$c6bea8c0@your029b8cecfe> <0cd501c7c98b$37ee9c10$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Subject: Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D?
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:30:19 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6e922792024732fb1bb6f346e63517e4
Hi, We discussed this on the list before Chicago and raised it during the meeting. There was no objection to adopting the draft. Authors, please repost the I-D as draft-ietf-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt with no changes except to boilerplate. Thanks, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:19 PM Subject: Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D? >I hear no dissent. > > We'll float the idea in front of the meeting in Chicago to give one last > chance for any complaints and then move forwards immediately after > Chicago. > > Thanks, > Adrian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> > To: "Dan Li" <danli@huawei.com>; "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> > Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>; "Arun Satyanarayana" > <asatyana@cisco.com> > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 1:40 PM > Subject: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt as WG I-D? > > >> Hi, >> >> In Prague we found that there was some support for this work, and no >> opposition. >> >> There were questions regarding clarifying that the work does not define >> new process or procedures, but explains how existing procedures (i.e. >> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-08.txt) can be applied in a variety of >> situations. I think that this revision has included this clarification. >> >> There was a request to broaden the draft to cover all scenarios (not just >> multi-node as before), and this has been done. >> >> There was concern about whether there was "service provider" interest in >> this work. In fact, several of the hands raised to express interest >> worked for service providers. But I am not personally convinced that this >> Informational work needs strong support from that sector. More to the >> point would be support from the vendors who need to agree how they will >> operate draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext. >> >> So, I'd like to ask the WG whether there is support to make this I-D a WG >> draft. >> If we do, I would like to see it complete quite quickly. It would need: >> - review by vendors to make sure it is accurate >> - a bit more text on security issues >> >> Thanks, >> Adrian >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Dan Li" <danli@huawei.com> >> To: "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> >> Cc: "Deborah A. Brungard" <dbrungard@att.com>; "Farrel, Adrian" >> <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; "Arun Satyanarayana" <asatyana@cisco.com> >> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:08 AM >> Subject: New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt >> >> >>> Dear CCAMPers, >>> >>> We have published a "new" I-D: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt >>> >>> This I-D replaces the previous I-D >>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/draft-li-ccamp-multinodes-gr-proc-01.txt. >>> >>> According to the discussion in Prague meeting, we have: >>> 1) Changed draft to be Informational. Mainly rewords the draft to make >>> sure that it does not give instructions that could be interpreted as >>> defining the procedures. >>> 2) The title of the I-D has been changed to "Description of the RSVP-TE >>> Graceful Restart Procedures", in order to wide the scope of this I-D to >>> include the single node graceful restart scenario. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Dan Li >> >> >> >> > > > >
- New draft: draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt Dan Li
- Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.txt … Adrian Farrel
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Lucy Yong
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Young Lee
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Greg Bernstein
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Mach Chen
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Diego Caviglia (GA/ERI)
- RE: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Bardalai, Snigdho
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… fabien.verhaeghe
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Zhang Renhai
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Dan Li
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Arun Satyanarayana
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Support for draft-li-ccamp-gr-description-00.… Adrian Farrel